IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Stranger-Originated Life Insurance (STOLI): Controversy and Proposal for Market-Based Solutions

Listed author(s):
  • Randall Guttery
  • Enya (Min) He
  • Stephen Poe
Registered author(s):

    A Stranger-Originated Life Insurance (STOLI) transaction arises when a life insurance policy is effectively procured by a stranger, usually a third-party investor unrelated to the insured. Despite the growing frequency and popularity of STOLI transactions, there has been much discussion, but a lack of academic research, on the issues and challenges they have generated. The purpose of this research is to shed some light on this innovative insurance transaction by providing a clearer understanding of the controversy created by the STOLI phenomenon, and to argue that regulatory action aimed at restricting or prohibiting these transactions seems unnecessary. After examining the controversy generated by STOLI transactions from the perspective of consumers, insurance carriers, and state insurance regulators, we review the primary initiatives to regulate STOLI transactions, analyze the concerns that have been raised about these transactions, and conclude with proposals for market-based solutions and other reforms to address these concerns and other issues that have given rise to the STOLI controversy.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by Western Risk and Insurance Association in its journal Journal of Insurance Issues.

    Volume (Year): 35 (2012)
    Issue (Month): 1 ()
    Pages: 100-117

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:wri:journl:v:35:y:2012:i:1:p:100-117
    Contact details of provider:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wri:journl:v:35:y:2012:i:1:p:100-117. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (James Barrese)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.