IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Is Efficiency an Important Determinant of A.M. Best Property-Liability Insurer Financial Strength Ratings?

Listed author(s):
  • David L. Eckles
  • Steven W. Pottier
Registered author(s):

    Insurance regulators, policyholders, and investors are interested in the ability of insurers to fulfill their financial obligations. Economic and finance theory suggests that, all else equal, more efficient firms should be financially stronger firms. Efficiency scores represent a quantitative measure that summarizes in a single value the relative effectiveness of a firm in achieving a stated objective, such as cost minimization. However, efficiency scores do not explicitly measure firm risk. Efficiency scores compare firms with similar inputs and outputs whereas insurer financial strength ratings compare insurers within a particular segment of the industry, such as property liability insurance, even though inputs and outputs may differ greatly. The purpose of this study is to examine the relation between insurer efficiency and insurer financial strength ratings. We find firm efficiency scores are a weak predictor of financial strength ratings in that they do not provide significant incremental predictive power over a model with even a few widely recognized rating determinants. Further, efficiency scores perform no better at predicting ratings than simply predicting ratings based on the modal rating category. These results suggest that users of efficiency scores should not use these measures to make inferences regarding insurer financial strength

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by Western Risk and Insurance Association in its journal Journal of Insurance Issues.

    Volume (Year): 34 (2011)
    Issue (Month): 1 ()
    Pages: 18-33

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:wri:journl:v:34:y:2011:i:1:p:18-33
    Contact details of provider:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wri:journl:v:34:y:2011:i:1:p:18-33. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (James Barrese)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.