IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is Efficiency an Important Determinant of A.M. Best Property-Liability Insurer Financial Strength Ratings?


  • David L. Eckles
  • Steven W. Pottier


Insurance regulators, policyholders, and investors are interested in the ability of insurers to fulfill their financial obligations. Economic and finance theory suggests that, all else equal, more efficient firms should be financially stronger firms. Efficiency scores represent a quantitative measure that summarizes in a single value the relative effectiveness of a firm in achieving a stated objective, such as cost minimization. However, efficiency scores do not explicitly measure firm risk. Efficiency scores compare firms with similar inputs and outputs whereas insurer financial strength ratings compare insurers within a particular segment of the industry, such as property liability insurance, even though inputs and outputs may differ greatly. The purpose of this study is to examine the relation between insurer efficiency and insurer financial strength ratings. We find firm efficiency scores are a weak predictor of financial strength ratings in that they do not provide significant incremental predictive power over a model with even a few widely recognized rating determinants. Further, efficiency scores perform no better at predicting ratings than simply predicting ratings based on the modal rating category. These results suggest that users of efficiency scores should not use these measures to make inferences regarding insurer financial strength

Suggested Citation

  • David L. Eckles & Steven W. Pottier, 2011. "Is Efficiency an Important Determinant of A.M. Best Property-Liability Insurer Financial Strength Ratings?," Journal of Insurance Issues, Western Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 34(1), pages 18-33.
  • Handle: RePEc:wri:journl:v:34:y:2011:i:1:p:18-33

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wri:journl:v:34:y:2011:i:1:p:18-33. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (James Barrese). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.