IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Market Efficiency: Evidence from Market Reactions of Insurance Industry Stocks to the September 11, 2001 Event

Listed author(s):
  • Yuling Wang
  • Richard B. Corbett
Registered author(s):

    The events of September 11, 2001 had profound financial consequences for the insurance industry. Property and liability insurers took significant underwriting losses in many lines as a result of this event. Property and liability insurer stocks might then be expected to have higher negative abnormal returns than the stocks of life and health insurers. Using traditional event study methodology with a longer event window, we find that property and liability insurer stocks did generate much larger abnormal returns than those of life and health insurers. We also find that, after the first week of trading subsequent to the market's reopening on September 17, the abnormal returns were not significant from zero, which is consistent •with the efficient market hypothesis. Insurance industry Stocks recovered quickly after the events of September 11 and sometimes even outperformed the market. Investors were rational and responded to the expectation of increases in insurance demand and strength in capacity constraints.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by Western Risk and Insurance Association in its journal Journal of Insurance Issues.

    Volume (Year): 31 (2008)
    Issue (Month): 2 ()
    Pages: 152-167

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:wri:journl:v:31:y:2008:i:2:p:152-167
    Contact details of provider:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wri:journl:v:31:y:2008:i:2:p:152-167. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (James Barrese)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.