IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

An Empirical Examination of Sample Selection Methods in the Context of Life Insurer Financial Distress

Listed author(s):
  • James M. Carson
  • Robert E. Hoyt
Registered author(s):

    This study empirically examines properties of matched-pair versus non matched- pair sampling methods in the context of financial distress for the U.S. life insurance industry. While the majority of prior insurer insolvency studies employed matched-pair sampling techniques to identify important variables and to classify and predict firms likely to become financially distressed, we provide empirical evidence that three solvency-related items are sample dependent: variables identified as important measures of insolvency, coefficients, and classification rates. Thus, empirical studies employing relatively small matched-pair samples are likely to yield sample specific results that are not fully generalizable to the relevant population of firms. Results apply directly to financial distress models and also extend to other research employing choice-based sampling methods that involve binary state models with skewed distribution of the two states of interest.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by Western Risk and Insurance Association in its journal Journal of Insurance Issues.

    Volume (Year): 26 (2003)
    Issue (Month): 2 ()
    Pages: 114-128

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:wri:journl:v:26:y:2003:i:2:p:114-128
    Contact details of provider:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wri:journl:v:26:y:2003:i:2:p:114-128. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (James Barrese)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.