Relative Effects of Premium Loading and Tax Deductions on the Demand for Insurance
This paper derives reduced-form equations for estimating the relative effects of premium loading and income tax deductions on the demand for insurance. In the absence of loading, tax deductions would not affect the equilibrium in the market for individually purchased health insurance. With loading, the proportion of uninsured medical losses due to tax deductibility is equal to the tax rate, assuming constant absolute risk aversion; the proportion is between 40 and 86 percent in the casualty insurance market, and between 30 and 70 percent in the theft insurance market. The effects of tax deductions are greater under decreasing absolute risk aversion.
Volume (Year): 25 (2002)
Issue (Month): 1 ()
|Contact details of provider:|| |
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wri:journl:v:25:y:2002:i:1:p:47-62. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (James Barrese)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.