IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Insurer Stock Price Responses to the Disclosure of Revised Insured Loss Estimates After the 1994 Northridge Earthquake

Listed author(s):
  • David C. Marlett
  • Richard Corbett
  • Carl Pacini
Registered author(s):

    Several studies have examined the effect of a catastrophic earthquake on the market value of property-liability (P&L) insurers. This study differs from previous ones in that it examines the market effects of revisions to estimated insured losses from the Northridge earthquake over an 18-month period. Three competing theories—the pessimistic, threshold, and hardening theories—are offered to predict and explain insurer share price reaction to estimates of insured losses. Using both a generalized least squares portfolio approach and a nonparametric event study technique (Corrado’s rank statistic), we found significant share price reactions to certain announcements. These disclosures are associated with investors’ beliefs that the Northridge earthquake led the P&L insurance industry to shift toward the upside of the underwriting cycle. However, no evidence was found to indicate that the market had either an ability or a willingness to discriminate among exposed and unexposed insurers in the aftermath of the Northridge earthquake. In short, the results provide more support for the hardening theory than for the threshold or pessimistic theories.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by Western Risk and Insurance Association in its journal Journal of Insurance Issues.

    Volume (Year): 23 (2000)
    Issue (Month): 2 ()
    Pages: 103-123

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:wri:journl:v:23:y:2000:i:2:p:103-123
    Contact details of provider:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wri:journl:v:23:y:2000:i:2:p:103-123. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (James Barrese)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.