IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/woraff/v183y2020i2p105-124.html

Anti‐Vaccination Beliefs and Unrelated Conspiracy Theories

Author

Listed:
  • Zachary J. Goldberg
  • Sean Richey

Abstract

Much recent literature has examined the correlates of anti‐vaccination beliefs, without specifying the mechanism that creates adherence to these debunked ideas. We posit that anti‐vaccination beliefs are an outcome of a general psychological propensity to believe in conspiracies based on new research on the interconnectedness of conspiracy beliefs. These ideas are tested with a confirmatory factor analysis and a seemingly unrelated regression (SUR) model of a nationally representative U.S. sample from the 2016 American National Election Studies. The confirmatory factor analysis shows that anti‐vaccination beliefs highly correlate with belief in the unrelated conspiracies that Obama is a Muslim and 9/11 trutherism. Our SUR models also show that all three of these very different beliefs have similar predictors. All three have a negative correlation with political trust, political knowledge, education, and a positive correlation with authoritarianism. Thus, anti‐vaccination beliefs are shown to be part of a psychological propensity to believe in conspiracies. Mucha literatura reciente ha examinado los correlatos de las creencias contra la vacunación, sin especificar el mecanismo que crea la adhesión a estas ideas desacreditadas. Creemos que las creencias antivacunación son el resultado de una propensión psicológica general a creer en conspiraciones basadas en una nueva investigación sobre la interconexión de las creencias de conspiración. Ponemos a prueba nuestras ideas con un análisis factorial confirmatorio y un modelo de Regresión aparentemente no relacionada (SUR) de una muestra representativa a nivel nacional de los Estudios de elecciones nacionales estadounidenses de 2016. El análisis factorial confirmatorio muestra que las creencias anti‐vacunación se correlacionan altamente con la creencia en las conspiraciones no relacionadas de que Obama es un musulmán y el trutherismo del 11‐S. Nuestros modelos SUR también muestran que estas tres creencias muy diferentes tienen predictores similares. Los tres tienen una correlación negativa con la confianza política, el conocimiento político, la educación y una correlación positiva del autoritarismo. Por lo tanto, las creencias anti‐vacunación se muestran como parte de una propensión psicológica a creer en conspiraciones. 近年来许多文献已检验了反疫苗信念相关物,但却没有指出相关机制来支持这些互不关联的看法。基于阴谋论信念的相互关联性的新研究,我们假设,反疫苗信念是一种相信阴谋论的普遍心理倾向的产物。我们用一项验证性因素分析和似不相关回归(SUR)模型对假设进行检验,该模型选取来自2016 年美国国家选举研究的一项全国代表样本。验证性因素分析表明,反疫苗信念与奥巴马是穆斯林及 911 事件真相主义这些不相关阴谋论信念高度相关。SUR 模型也显示,这三种截然不同的信念拥有相似的预测物。这三种信念都与政治信任、政治知识、教育呈负相关, 而与威权主义呈正相关。 因此,反疫苗信念被证明是相信阴谋论这一心理倾向的一部分。

Suggested Citation

  • Zachary J. Goldberg & Sean Richey, 2020. "Anti‐Vaccination Beliefs and Unrelated Conspiracy Theories," World Affairs, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 183(2), pages 105-124, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:woraff:v:183:y:2020:i:2:p:105-124
    DOI: 10.1177/0043820020920554
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/0043820020920554
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0043820020920554?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lawrence C. Hamilton & Joel Hartter & Kei Saito, 2015. "Trust in Scientists on Climate Change and Vaccines," SAGE Open, , vol. 5(3), pages 21582440156, August.
    2. Radnitz, Scott & Underwood, Patrick, 2017. "Is Belief in Conspiracy Theories Pathological? A Survey Experiment on the Cognitive Roots of Extreme Suspicion," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 47(1), pages 113-129, January.
    3. repec:plo:pone00:0158382 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Joanne M. Miller & Kyle L. Saunders & Christina E. Farhart, 2016. "Conspiracy Endorsement as Motivated Reasoning: The Moderating Roles of Political Knowledge and Trust," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 60(4), pages 824-844, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Casey A. Klofstad & Joseph E. Uscinski & Jennifer M. Connolly & Jonathan P. West, 2019. "What drives people to believe in Zika conspiracy theories?," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 5(1), pages 1-8, December.
    2. E. Keith Smith & Adam Mayer, 2019. "Anomalous Anglophones? Contours of free market ideology, political polarization, and climate change attitudes in English-speaking countries, Western European and post-Communist states," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 152(1), pages 17-34, January.
    3. Haywantee Ramkissoon, 2021. "Social Bonding and Public Trust/Distrust in COVID-19 Vaccines," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-6, September.
    4. Laura Colautti & Alice Cancer & Sara Magenes & Alessandro Antonietti & Paola Iannello, 2022. "Risk-Perception Change Associated with COVID-19 Vaccine’s Side Effects: The Role of Individual Differences," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-14, January.
    5. Linda M. Fogg & Lawrence C. Hamilton & Erin S. Bell, 2020. "Views of the Highway: Infrastructure Reality, Perceptions, and Politics," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(4), pages 21582440209, October.
    6. Thomas G. Safford & Emily H. Whitmore & Lawrence C. Hamilton, 2021. "Scientists, presidents, and pandemics—comparing the science–politics nexus during the Zika virus and COVID‐19 outbreaks," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 102(6), pages 2482-2498, November.
    7. repec:plo:pone00:0211269 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Wenting Yu & Zhicong Chen & Xiang Meng & Qing Yan, 2024. "Propagating COVID-19 Conspiracy Theories: The Influence of Right-Wing Sources," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(2), pages 21582440241, June.
    9. Ho Fai Chan & Nikita Ferguson & David A. Savage & David Stadelmann & Benno Torgler, 2020. "Is Science Able to Perform Under Pressure? Insights from COVID-19," CREMA Working Paper Series 2020-07, Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA).
    10. Walter, Dror & Ophir, Yotam & Lokmanoglu, Ayse D. & Pruden, Meredith L., 2022. "Vaccine discourse in white nationalist online communication: A mixed-methods computational approach," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).
    11. Christel W. van Eck & Bob C. Mulder & Sander van der Linden, 2020. "Climate Change Risk Perceptions of Audiences in the Climate Change Blogosphere," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-17, September.
    12. Raluca Buturoiu & Georgiana Udrea & Denisa-Adriana Oprea & Nicoleta Corbu, 2021. "Who Believes in Conspiracy Theories about the COVID-19 Pandemic in Romania? An Analysis of Conspiracy Theories Believers’ Profiles," Societies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-16, November.
    13. Lawrence C. Hamilton, 2016. "Public Awareness of the Scientific Consensus on Climate," SAGE Open, , vol. 6(4), pages 21582440166, November.
    14. Erik O. Sterner & Tom Adawi & U. Martin Persson & Ulrika Lundqvist, 2019. "Knowing how and knowing when: unpacking public understanding of atmospheric CO2 accumulation," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 154(1), pages 49-67, May.
    15. Callaghan, Timothy & Motta, Matthew & Sylvester, Steven & Lunz Trujillo, Kristin & Blackburn, Christine Crudo, 2019. "Parent psychology and the decision to delay childhood vaccination," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 238(C), pages 1-1.
    16. Motta, Matthew & Callaghan, Timothy & Sylvester, Steven, 2018. "Knowing less but presuming more: Dunning-Kruger effects and the endorsement of anti-vaccine policy attitudes," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 274-281.
    17. Liat Ayalon, 2021. "Trust and Compliance with COVID-19 Preventive Behaviors during the Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-10, March.
    18. Buckman, Cierra & Liu, Indran C. & Cortright, Lindsay & Tumin, Dmitry & Syed, Salma, 2020. "The influence of local political trends on childhood vaccine completion in North Carolina," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    19. Lucia Savadori & Giuseppe Espa & Maria Michela Dickson, 2020. "The polarizing impact of numeracy, economic literacy, and science literacy on attitudes toward immigration," Papers 2011.02362, arXiv.org.
    20. Mohamed Mostagir & James Siderius, 2022. "Learning in a Post-Truth World," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(4), pages 2860-2868, April.
    21. Farhart, Christina E. & Struby, Ethan, 2026. "Inflation expectations and political polarization: Evidence from the cooperative election study," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:woraff:v:183:y:2020:i:2:p:105-124. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.