IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/transj/v65y2026i2ne70020.html

The Impact of Learning Modality, Academic Performance, and Demographics on Self‐Perceived Mastery of Supply Chain Employee Competencies

Author

Listed:
  • Lathan Craig Austin
  • Anthony D. Miyazaki

Abstract

Employee self‐perceived competencies have been shown to affect numerous facets of employment, such as employee career mobility, willingness to learn, and job satisfaction, yet little is known about the contributors to these self‐perceptions in logistics/supply chain management (L/SCM) employees. Using data from 339 employees who graduated within the last 5 years from L/SCM programs, we explore the impact of learning modality (online vs. face‐to‐face), academic performance, age, and gender on employee self‐perceptions of functional logistics knowledge, logistics‐related technology skills, and managerially relevant soft skills. Findings reveal that for employees in logistics management roles, face‐to‐face learning (vs. online learning) enhanced self‐perceived soft skills but had no significant impact on logistics knowledge or technology skills. Conversely, employees in logistician roles reported higher self‐perceived competencies across all areas when learning face‐to‐face. For employees in both roles, academic performance positively influenced knowledge and technology skills but not soft skills, while age differentially affected competencies across roles. The results underscore the need for L/SCM programs to optimize learning across modalities and integrate soft skills training to better prepare graduates for diverse professional challenges.

Suggested Citation

  • Lathan Craig Austin & Anthony D. Miyazaki, 2026. "The Impact of Learning Modality, Academic Performance, and Demographics on Self‐Perceived Mastery of Supply Chain Employee Competencies," Transportation Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 65(2), April.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:transj:v:65:y:2026:i:2:n:e70020
    DOI: 10.1002/tjo3.70020
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/tjo3.70020
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/tjo3.70020?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:transj:v:65:y:2026:i:2:n:e70020. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.