IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/transj/v64y2025i3ne70009.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rosie, Take the Wheel: Examining EEOC Actions and Gender Diversity in Frontline Logistics Occupations

Author

Listed:
  • Lila Al‐shwaf
  • Alex Scott
  • Justin T. Kistler

Abstract

Research studying the effect of lawsuits on corporate gender diversity suggests that legal actions increase the number of women employed by affected firms. However, this has only been studied in professional settings, where the percentage of women in the workforce has significantly increased in recent decades. In frontline occupations, women continue to be vastly underrepresented. We examined whether legal actions against firms that employ truck drivers increase their representation of women drivers. We created a database of legal actions taken by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) against firms that employ truck drivers and matched these with gender composition data of trucking firms. Using a difference‐in‐differences framework, we find that EEOC actions have little to no effect on the percentage of women truck drivers. While firm size is positively associated with EEOC actions, the effect is small and insignificant, a finding that holds up to robustness tests. A post hoc analysis reveals that firms in our data employing a greater number of female drivers are much more likely to be subjected to these lawsuits. Our findings indicate that lawsuits effective in increasing corporate gender diversity do not similarly impact diversity in frontline roles.

Suggested Citation

  • Lila Al‐shwaf & Alex Scott & Justin T. Kistler, 2025. "Rosie, Take the Wheel: Examining EEOC Actions and Gender Diversity in Frontline Logistics Occupations," Transportation Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 64(3), July.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:transj:v:64:y:2025:i:3:n:e70009
    DOI: 10.1002/tjo3.70009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/tjo3.70009
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/tjo3.70009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:transj:v:64:y:2025:i:3:n:e70009. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.