IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/transj/v63y2024i2p111-126.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Supply chain management research productivity and topics: 2020–2022

Author

Listed:
  • Michael J. Maloni
  • Richard M. Franza
  • Graham H. Lowman
  • Stuart A. Naphsin
  • Sina Golara

Abstract

This article continues the longest‐standing evaluation of publication productivity in the academic field of supply chain with the combined series spanning 55 years. In this edition, we update the schools and individual scholars producing the most supply chain publications from 2020 to 2022. Despite a new top‐ranked school, the top 10 list remains largely consistent with previous editions, as does the core set of top supply chain doctoral programs. In contrast, the list of the remaining top 25 schools continues to change and includes more international (i.e., non‐U.S.) schools. Additionally, the barriers to entry to become a strong supply chain research school are lower than in the past, while author concentration analyses confirm that the supply chain scholarly field has become more dispersed. Combined, the results support not only highly productive authors and schools with recognition and resource requests but also aspiring authors and schools with their research paths and benchmarking. We voice concerns, however, about both the supply of new supply chain scholars and the decreasing authorship of industry practitioners that had been a staple of our applied field. As a further contribution, we organize the most frequent keywords since 2020 to help scholars identify contemporary and understudied topics.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael J. Maloni & Richard M. Franza & Graham H. Lowman & Stuart A. Naphsin & Sina Golara, 2024. "Supply chain management research productivity and topics: 2020–2022," Transportation Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 63(2), pages 111-126, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:transj:v:63:y:2024:i:2:p:111-126
    DOI: 10.1002/tjo3.12010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/tjo3.12010
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/tjo3.12010?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:transj:v:63:y:2024:i:2:p:111-126. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.