IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/transj/v55y2016i3p258-281.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Truck Driver Safety: An Evolutionary Research Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Matthew Douglas
  • Stephen Swartz

Abstract

Driver safety is consistently a top concern of motor‐carrier industry leaders at all levels. Efforts to improve safety performance span a variety of domains, and one key element of the safety problem is the behavior of the commercial motor‐vehicle operator—the driver of the “big rigs” we share the highways with on a daily basis. The purpose of this article is to tell the story of an ongoing research program designed to understand safe/unsafe driving in the unique occupational context of the North American commercial motor‐vehicle driver (i.e., truck driver). As part of a broad, multiyear effort, the investigators who immersed themselves in that culture at several motor carriers were granted unique access to their employees. By allowing the employees (safety professionals and drivers alike) to inform the research direction, overlaid with extant psychosocial behavioral models post hoc, a promising stream of research was developed that led to a more integrated and comprehensive theoretical framework. The framework informs the development of interventions in hiring and training designed to improve driver safety. Recommendations for how this approach can be applied to other domains are provided.

Suggested Citation

  • Matthew Douglas & Stephen Swartz, 2016. "Truck Driver Safety: An Evolutionary Research Approach," Transportation Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 55(3), pages 258-281, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:transj:v:55:y:2016:i:3:p:258-281
    DOI: 10.5325/transportationj.55.3.0258
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.5325/transportationj.55.3.0258
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5325/transportationj.55.3.0258?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:transj:v:55:y:2016:i:3:p:258-281. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.