IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/transj/v50y2011i4p416-430.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fourth Annual Logistics Faculty Salary Survey

Author

Listed:
  • Ila Manuj
  • Atefeh Yazdanparast
  • M. Theodore Farris
  • Jerry W. Wilson

Abstract

While the Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business (AACSB) International conducts an annual survey of business school faculty and administrative salaries, the standard reporting does not specify salary figures for logistics (and related areas such as supply chain management) faculty. Since the growth in the number of logistics faculty positions has continued to exceed the output of doctoral programs in the field for more than a decade, it is logical to assume that logistics faculty salaries, at all levels, are increasing. However, without factual data, questions such as what salary should a new logistics PhD expect, and what should an administrator budget for a logistics faculty position, cannot be answered satisfactorily. Moreover, everyone expects and wants to be adequately compensated. However, for the specific discipline of logistics and supply chain management (SCM), the data on average compensation across different ranks, institutions, and other such factors is not available. In order to provide such factual data, the authors have developed a survey to collect annual data on logistics and supply chain faculty salaries. This year’s survey was the fourth in the past five years.

Suggested Citation

  • Ila Manuj & Atefeh Yazdanparast & M. Theodore Farris & Jerry W. Wilson, 2011. "Fourth Annual Logistics Faculty Salary Survey," Transportation Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 50(4), pages 416-430, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:transj:v:50:y:2011:i:4:p:416-430
    DOI: 10.5325/transportationj.50.4.0416
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.5325/transportationj.50.4.0416
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5325/transportationj.50.4.0416?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:transj:v:50:y:2011:i:4:p:416-430. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.