IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/syseng/v9y2006i2p146-159.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

System and software architecture reconciliation

Author

Listed:
  • Mark W. Maier

Abstract

Large, complex systems today are increasingly software‐intensive. As a result, it is commonly essential that system development methods strongly facilitate good software development, even where to do so departs from traditional systems engineering practice. Unfortunately, the traditional state of the practice in systems engineering and system architecture descriptions are often not well suited to support complex software developments. For example, traditional systems engineering practice is to take a function‐first approach to definition, while software architectures are typically driven from the external interfaces inward, and are more often data‐based than function‐based. Moreover, the most successful very large system architectures typically take a strongly layered approach, with deliberate selection of convergence layers, a concept not typically found in traditional systems engineering practice. Each of these issues can be addressed through understanding of the elements of a good software architecture, appropriate ordering of systems engineering activities, and modeling methods extended to encompass layered system descriptions. While the example here is specific to software‐intensive systems, the methods applied can be extended to other types of domain integration. © 2006 Syst Eng 9: 146–159, 2006

Suggested Citation

  • Mark W. Maier, 2006. "System and software architecture reconciliation," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 9(2), pages 146-159, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:syseng:v:9:y:2006:i:2:p:146-159
    DOI: 10.1002/sys.20050
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.20050
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sys.20050?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marcus A. Bellamy & Rahul C. Basole, 2013. "Network analysis of supply chain systems: A systematic review and future research," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(2), pages 235-249, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:syseng:v:9:y:2006:i:2:p:146-159. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6858 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.