IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/syseng/v7y2004i4pno-noa.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Conceptual system design evaluation: Rating and ranking versus compliance analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Caroline Smith
  • Dinesh Verma

Abstract

The conceptual design phase is a critical part of the systems engineering approach, in terms of commitment of both time and money. Structure and discipline at this time are fundamental to the efficient and effective development of competitive products and systems. However, the extent and resolution of information available during this phase, in the form of parameter values and priorities, is typically characterized by imprecision and subjectivity. Such uncertainty can be represented by fuzzy variables and linguistic values. Discrimination between competing product concepts thus necessitates identification of a defuzzification technique to allow comparison of imprecise requirements with imprecise expected values for conceptual alternatives. Since fuzzy numbers do not exhibit complete order, many existing defuzzification techniques are based on the philosophy of rating and ranking fuzzy sets. This paper argues that a defuzzification technique based on the degree of compliance between required and anticipated parameter values is more suited to concept evaluation and selection. The advantage of such an approach is demonstrated and a fuzzy logic based framework for this purpose is proposed. Finally, techniques for accelerating such a compliance analysis are suggested. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Syst Eng 7: 338–351, 2004

Suggested Citation

  • Caroline Smith & Dinesh Verma, 2004. "Conceptual system design evaluation: Rating and ranking versus compliance analysis," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 7(4), pages 1-1.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:syseng:v:7:y:2004:i:4:p:no-no:a
    DOI: 10.1002/sys.20011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.20011
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sys.20011?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. A.M.M. Sharif Ullah, 2005. "A fuzzy decision model for conceptual design," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 8(4), pages 296-308.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:syseng:v:7:y:2004:i:4:p:no-no:a. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6858 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.