IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/syseng/v7y2004i2p99-112.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A systems framework for safety and security: The holistic paradigm

Author

Listed:
  • A. G. Hessami

Abstract

New discoveries coupled with the incessant desire to improve performance and reduce cost of products and services tend to encourage the deployment of novel technologies, which are often more complex in nature than their earlier counterparts. However, recent experience bears witness to the need for better vision and foresight in appreciation of the detrimental aspects alongside seemingly beneficial and rewarding facets of modern systems, processes, and products. Among many aspects to the performance of systems, safety is a human‐focused and complex socio‐technical issue. The classical view of safety is largely biased towards the causality of hazardous states and failure of products, processes, and systems, often taking a narrow technical reliability perspective in place of sensitivity to human dimension. Later philosophies have advocated the extension of failure‐based approaches to take into account assessment of likely accidents and consequent harm to people. Against this setting, security, which is a major and more recent concern, is analogous to safety, differing mainly in malicious intent and deliberate causation rather than unplanned random or systematic causes. This paper proposes a new paradigm for holistic systems assurance, of which safety performance and security/vulnerability are key aspects. While principally focused on safety assurance, the proposed paradigm is broadly applicable to any facet of a system's performance and goes beyond the current horizons of systems safety landscape. It develops and proposes a more inclusive approach and extension of current systems safety domain, comprising scope and issues beyond accident causation and consequential loss. It further advocates a more extensive view of loss, encompassing harm to people and damage to the natural habitat as well as detriment to a business enterprise or society at large. References to safety assurance in this paper are synonymous with ensuring health, safety, and welfare of people. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Syst Eng 7: 99–112, 2004

Suggested Citation

  • A. G. Hessami, 2004. "A systems framework for safety and security: The holistic paradigm," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 7(2), pages 99-112.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:syseng:v:7:y:2004:i:2:p:99-112
    DOI: 10.1002/sys.10060
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.10060
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sys.10060?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. A. Terry Bahill & Steven J. Henderson, 2005. "Requirements development, verification, and validation exhibited in famous failures," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 8(1), pages 1-14.
    2. Sheu‐Wen Chuang & Chung‐Yu Pan & Chin‐Yin Huang, 2009. "A system‐oriented analysis model to enhance patient safety in healthcare organizations," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 12(3), pages 218-232, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:syseng:v:7:y:2004:i:2:p:99-112. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6858 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.