IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/syseng/v5y2002i3p223-241.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Theoretical framework for the continuous early validation (CEaVa) method

Author

Listed:
  • Robert F. Larsen
  • Dennis M. Buede

Abstract

Systems being developed today make extensive and complex use of advanced technology. Many, if not most, of these systems are being produced but are not used or useful on delivery because the wrong problem was solved. A major cause for this shortfall in system development is due to changes in the operational environment of the intended system while the development process is ongoing. Significant sections of the literature discuss the need to get stakeholders involved earlier in the development process to correct this problem. However, no one has developed a detailed framework that accomplishes this intent. This paper defines a method involving a four‐step sequence that validates the entire system design process early and continuously to ensure that the right problem is being solved. The method is called Continuous Early Validation (CEaVa). It is a method that increases the likelihood of producing the correct system. The method develops visibility of potential disconnects among stakeholders' needs, original written requirements, organizational policy, and derived requirements. The CEaVa method validates the external and internal consistency of the problem statement. Additionally, CEaVa facilitates consensus on trade offs and priorities, resolving the potential disconnects with decision analytical reasoning for trade‐off analysis. The CEaVa method improves the development process and ultimately the system itself by increasing the likelihood of building the right system within budget and schedule. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Syst Eng 5: 223–241, 2002

Suggested Citation

  • Robert F. Larsen & Dennis M. Buede, 2002. "Theoretical framework for the continuous early validation (CEaVa) method," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 5(3), pages 223-241.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:syseng:v:5:y:2002:i:3:p:223-241
    DOI: 10.1002/sys.10022
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.10022
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sys.10022?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alan B. Marchant, 2010. "Obstacles to the flow of requirements verification," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:syseng:v:5:y:2002:i:3:p:223-241. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6858 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.