IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/syseng/v5y2002i1p62-72.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

EIA IS 731 compared to CMMISM‐SE/SW

Author

Listed:
  • Ilene Minnich

Abstract

This paper provides the reader with a high‐level comparison between the Electronic Industries Association (EIA) Interim Standard (IS) 731, the Systems Engineering Capability Model (SECM) [G47 Systems Engineering Committee, 1999], and the Capability Maturity Model IntegrationSM (CMMISM) for Systems Engineering (SE) and Software Engineering (SW) [CMMISM Product Development Team, 2000a]. A brief background of the SECM and its contents is provided, followed by a comparison of Focus Areas of the SECM to Process Areas of the CMMISM. Also compared are the Capability Levels and Generic Practices of the two models, and the scoring rules associated with the two respective appraisal methods. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Syst Eng 5: 62–72, 2002; DOI 10.1002/sys.10013

Suggested Citation

  • Ilene Minnich, 2002. "EIA IS 731 compared to CMMISM‐SE/SW," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 5(1), pages 62-72.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:syseng:v:5:y:2002:i:1:p:62-72
    DOI: 10.1002/sys.10013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.10013
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sys.10013?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:syseng:v:5:y:2002:i:1:p:62-72. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6858 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.