IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/syseng/v2y1999i4p242-247.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A structured approximate reasoning‐based approach for gathering “lessons learned” information from system development projects

Author

Listed:
  • Joseph V. Vandeville
  • Muzaffar A. Shaikh

Abstract

In this paper, a structured approach for collecting “lessons learned” information obtained from system development projects is discussed. To aid in the analysis of lessons learned, the collection framework incorporates techniques associated with approximate reasoning. The primary goal of collecting lessons learned is to improve organizational and project performance. Therefore, this approach concentrates on focusing the collection of lessons learned on this goal. This approach ties the collection of lessons learned to the process model used by the organization. This model is typically based on capability models such as the Systems Engineering Capability Maturity Model (SE‐CMM1) and Software CMM (SW‐CMM), as well as process standards such as ISO 9000 and the organization's standard engineering practices. This approach utilizes the organization's process framework to provide a structured, lessons learned program which can be used by projects during and at the completion of their execution. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Syst Eng 2: 242–247, 1999

Suggested Citation

  • Joseph V. Vandeville & Muzaffar A. Shaikh, 1999. "A structured approximate reasoning‐based approach for gathering “lessons learned” information from system development projects," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2(4), pages 242-247.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:syseng:v:2:y:1999:i:4:p:242-247
    DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6858(1999)2:43.0.CO;2-C
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6858(1999)2:43.0.CO;2-C
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6858(1999)2:43.0.CO;2-C?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:syseng:v:2:y:1999:i:4:p:242-247. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6858 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.