IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/syseng/v2y1999i2p108-128.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The use of simulation models in model driven experimentation

Author

Listed:
  • Holly A. H. Handley
  • Zainab R. Zaidi
  • Alexander H. Levis

Abstract

In model‐driven or model‐based experimentation, the model of the experiment is a key component of the closed loop model of the process. The model is created through interaction with the team designing the experimental organizations as well as the team creating the experimental environment. Starting with preliminary descriptions, the model evolves as more specific details are available and influences the final experimental design. The methodology used to design the model reflects both the types of design information available and the underlying hypothesis of the experiment. Experiments validating fixed types of structures or processes lead to a model designed with a structured analysis design technique which leads to an explicit but rigid model design. Experiments investigating adaptation require a more flexible model which can be created using an object oriented design approach. This leads to a more flexible, object view of the experimental design. Either approach leads to an appropriate set of models from which an executable model can be derived. The executable model is used to carry out simulations. In order to analyze the dynamic behavior of the model, an input scenario must be created based on the actual inputs that will be used in the experimental setting. When the model is stimulated with the scenario, its behavior can be observed and its performance measured on different criteria. Because it is a computer simulation, input parameters can be varied, constraints can be relaxed, and other variables (possibly) affecting the hypotheses can be explored to see their effect on the model and by inference the experiment. These results can then be made available to the design teams to influence further iterations of the design. Indeed, the model allows the consideration of many excursions, a situation that is not possible when the experiments include teams of humans. After the experiment is conducted, model validation is carried out by comparing the model results to the actual experimental results. This is done by driving the model with the original scenario, but including the actual decisions made by the human subjects, or decision makers. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Syst Eng 2: 108–128, 1999

Suggested Citation

  • Holly A. H. Handley & Zainab R. Zaidi & Alexander H. Levis, 1999. "The use of simulation models in model driven experimentation," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2(2), pages 108-128.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:syseng:v:2:y:1999:i:2:p:108-128
    DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6858(1999)2:23.0.CO;2-D
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6858(1999)2:23.0.CO;2-D
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6858(1999)2:23.0.CO;2-D?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yuri N. Levchuk & Krishna R. Pattipati & David L. Kleinman, 1999. "Analytic model driven organizational design and experimentation in adaptive command and control," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2(2), pages 78-107.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tony Shell, 2003. "The synthesis of optimal systems design solutions," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 6(2), pages 92-105.
    2. Alexander H. Levis & W.S. Vaughan, 1999. "Model driven experimentation," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2(2), pages 62-68.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:syseng:v:2:y:1999:i:2:p:108-128. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6858 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.