IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/syseng/v21y2018i4p295-306.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling prize‐based open design challenges: General framework and FANG‐1 case study

Author

Listed:
  • Eun Suk Suh
  • Olivier Ladislas de Weck

Abstract

Many organizations are resorting to open prize‐based challenges and competitions to identify the best possible designs for their future products or services. As an example, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) hosted an open challenge for designing the drivetrain and mobility subsystem of a Fast Adaptable Next‐Generation Ground Vehicle (FANG‐1) in early 2013. A $1 million prize was awarded to the team with the highest concept score and the design was subsequently physically implemented and tested. The competition was the first attempt by DARPA to utilize crowdsourcing for the design of complex military systems, which is in contrast with contracting directly with a small number of incumbent firms within the defense industry. The competition attracted over 200 participating teams and the winning team was announced in April 2013. In this paper, inspired by the FANG‐1 challenge, a generalizable simulation model for predicting the dynamics of open prize‐based design challenges and competitions is developed using a combination of several modeling methods. The model is then applied to simulate the dynamics of the FANG‐1 challenge ex post facto, including an approximation of the distribution of team scores as well as the interteam motivational interactions. Using the simulation model, various sensitivity analyses were then performed to identify factors that could enhance future design challenges and competitions in terms of resulting innovation and productivity.

Suggested Citation

  • Eun Suk Suh & Olivier Ladislas de Weck, 2018. "Modeling prize‐based open design challenges: General framework and FANG‐1 case study," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(4), pages 295-306, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:syseng:v:21:y:2018:i:4:p:295-306
    DOI: 10.1002/sys.21434
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.21434
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sys.21434?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:syseng:v:21:y:2018:i:4:p:295-306. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6858 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.