IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/syseng/v21y2018i2p131-140.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Successful verification of subcontracted work in the construction industry

Author

Listed:
  • Rick Makkinga
  • Robin de Graaf
  • Hans Voordijk

Abstract

Due to the introduction of new types of contracts, such as Design, Build, Finance, & Maintain (DBFM), a major shift in tasks and responsibilities from client to contractor can be seen in the construction industry. To manage these new contracts and corresponding shifts in responsibilities, systems engineering (SE) is seen as a relevant instrument and applied increasingly in this industry. When these new, integrated contracts are applied in combination with SE, the contractor becomes responsible for verification. The contractor, however, is not the only organization that executes verification tasks as contractors regularly subcontract work to suppliers. Although the main contractor bears the final responsibility toward the client, it may be expected that the supplier verifies its own work. This requires verification to be carried out further down the supply chain. However, many problems are experienced when allocating these verification responsibilities to the suppliers. This paper explores which verification problems are faced in construction work that is subcontracted to suppliers. A conceptual framework is applied to categorize these problems and to analyze the solutions applied in the construction industry. The major finding of this study is that causes of verification problems can be found at both the contractor and the supplier side. Improvements are suggested for both these sides.

Suggested Citation

  • Rick Makkinga & Robin de Graaf & Hans Voordijk, 2018. "Successful verification of subcontracted work in the construction industry," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(2), pages 131-140, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:syseng:v:21:y:2018:i:2:p:131-140
    DOI: 10.1002/sys.21425
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.21425
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sys.21425?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:syseng:v:21:y:2018:i:2:p:131-140. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6858 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.