IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/syseng/v19y2016i4p375-391.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Use of Multifidelity and Surrogate Models in the Design and Development of Physics‐Based Systems

Author

Listed:
  • James L. Hebert
  • Thomas H. Holzer
  • Timothy J. Eveleigh
  • Shahryar Sarkani

Abstract

Building a complex system in a time and cost effective manner, that performs well, meets diverse user needs, and has no inimical emergent behaviors is a challenge. The solution is to model before building. End‐to‐end high fidelity (HF) computational modeling and simulation (M&S) of a complex system, while attractive, is often too time consuming and expensive and may preclude the use of traditional systems engineering (SE) development tools. Missing are practicable approaches to reduce this computational time and cost by segmenting M&S performance and behaviors, keeping the model chain coherent, and only modeling what is necessary. An efficient framework is presented that couples mixed fidelity and surrogate models to reduce M&S computational time and cost for analysis of component‐level and system‐level performance of complex physics‐based problems. This framework is used in an example to modify a Nuclear Electromagnetic Pulse (NEMP) Bounded Wave Simulator (BWS). The framework is flexible and potentially extensible; it may provide systems engineers with a cost‐effective alternative to current approaches for modeling physics‐based engineering systems (e.g., radar, communications systems).

Suggested Citation

  • James L. Hebert & Thomas H. Holzer & Timothy J. Eveleigh & Shahryar Sarkani, 2016. "Use of Multifidelity and Surrogate Models in the Design and Development of Physics‐Based Systems," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(4), pages 375-391, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:syseng:v:19:y:2016:i:4:p:375-391
    DOI: 10.1002/sys.21346
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.21346
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sys.21346?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:syseng:v:19:y:2016:i:4:p:375-391. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6858 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.