IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/syseng/v11y2008i1p27-38.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Space systems verification program and management process

Author

Listed:
  • Satoshi Nagano

Abstract

Having a solid verification program that ensures a “system is built right” plays a crucial role in both government and commercial space programs, since even the smallest error in a requirement, design/analysis, test, or inspection at every level of a system development could cause a major system malfunction and would be almost impossible to troubleshoot and repair once in space. According to the space/launch vehicles (SV/LVs) failure related data that have been collected by Aerospace Corporation since the 1960s, almost all of the post‐launch failures could have been prevented if their problems had been discovered prior to the shipment of these vehicles to their launch sites. In particular, it was found that the majority of these vehicles could have been successful if deficiencies were corrected during early phase (requirement and design phases) or lower system level of their systems development. In general, any latent problems discovered later on in system development would significantly impact cost and schedule of space programs, even if they were successfully corrected prior to launch. This paper presents a systematic approach to planning and executing verification of space systems based on a distributed‐space system verification program. It enforces a standardized set of modular‐management processes at every level and phase of space system development activities. This distributed verification program approach tries to enforce a standard set of management processes in order to prevent Total System Program Responsibility (TSPR) philosophy, a “faster, better, cheaper” approach, from being unintentionally adopted at any level of space system development due to schedule and cost pressures. This space systems verification approach is now explained in an U.S. DoD best practice document and also included in The Aerospace Corporation's specification and standard list. It has also been adopted as a compliance document in some major U.S. space programs, such as GPS Block III, and national security space programs. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Syst Eng

Suggested Citation

  • Satoshi Nagano, 2008. "Space systems verification program and management process," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(1), pages 27-38, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:syseng:v:11:y:2008:i:1:p:27-38
    DOI: 10.1002/sys.20084
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.20084
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sys.20084?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Arekhandia Patrick Eigbe & Brian J. Sauser & John Boardman, 2010. "Soft systems analysis of the unification of test and evaluation and program management: A study of a Federal Aviation Administration's strategy," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(3), pages 298-310, September.
    2. Alan B. Marchant, 2010. "Obstacles to the flow of requirements verification," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, March.
    3. Nathan J. Slegers & Ronald T. Kadish & Gary E. Payton & John Thomas & Michael D. Griffin & Dan Dumbacher, 2012. "Learning from failure in systems engineering: A panel discussion," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(1), pages 74-82, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:syseng:v:11:y:2008:i:1:p:27-38. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6858 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.