IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/sustdv/v7y1999i2p57-63.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Towards a new approach to income distribution and enviromental sustainability

Author

Listed:
  • Frances Hutchinson

    (University of Bradford, UK)

  • Brian Burkitt

    (University of Bradford, UK)

Abstract

The paper argues that, in contemporary market economies, most production is debt financed. In order to pay off these debts, there is a necessity for economic growth that results in enormous waste of human effort and a misuse of the earth's resources. The Douglas-Orage Social Credit analysis, which attracted world-wide attention during the 1920s and 1930s, concluded that the pressure for economic growth, induced by the role of finance, led inevitably to economic and military rivalry between nations, and to long run environmental degradation, because short run maximization decisions squander non-sustainable resources, whilst ignoring the 'third party' social benefits and costs that arise out of the process of exchange. The Draft Mining Scheme put forward by Douglas and Orage in 1920 sought to avoid these difficulties by devolving responsibility for finance to industrially based local producers' banks. Such a financial system could create a framework under which ecological sustainability becomes economically viable. Economic developments over the decades since the Douglas-Orage texts were published have emphasized the need to remove the dominant role of finance in determining economic and industrial policy. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Frances Hutchinson & Brian Burkitt, 1999. "Towards a new approach to income distribution and enviromental sustainability," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 7(2), pages 57-63.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:7:y:1999:i:2:p:57-63
    DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1719(199905)7:2<57::AID-SD105>3.0.CO;2-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:7:y:1999:i:2:p:57-63. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1719 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.