Author
Listed:
- Anastasia Gkargkavouzi
- George E. Halkos
Abstract
The current study presents a causal model of climate‐induced psychological resilience by assessing the impact of dispositional mindfulness, self‐efficacy beliefs, and perceived restorativeness of nature. It further examines the associations among climate change coping strategies, subjective well‐being components, eco‐emotions, and resilience. Structured questionnaires were administered to 552 participants selected through stratified sampling in a cross‐sectional design. The hypothesized model was tested through Structural Equation Modeling, with additional analyses addressing common method bias and evaluating construct reliability and validity. Results revealed that the measurement and structural models demonstrated an acceptable fit, and all latent constructs exhibited satisfactory reliability and construct validity. Dispositional mindfulness and self‐efficacy were found to significantly enhance psychological resilience, whereas the perceived restorativeness of nature showed no significant effect. Perceived climate resilience was positively associated with coping appraisals, life satisfaction, and positive affect, while negatively linked to eco‐emotions. The study underscores the need for further empirical investigation to validate these associations and develop a comprehensive psychological model of climate resilience. Results may inform policy development and targeted interventions aimed at strengthening psychological resilience and promoting mental health amidst escalating climate challenges, contributing to the achievement of SDG 3 (Good Health and Well‐being), SDG 11 (Sustainable Cities and Communities), and SDG 13 (Climate Action).
Suggested Citation
Anastasia Gkargkavouzi & George E. Halkos, 2026.
"Psychological Resilience to Climate Change: The Role of Self‐Efficacy, Mindfulness, Perceived Nature Restorativeness, and Subjective Well‐Being,"
Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(S2), pages 1435-1457, March.
Handle:
RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:34:y:2026:i:s2:p:1435-1457
DOI: 10.1002/sd.70401
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:34:y:2026:i:s2:p:1435-1457. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1719 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.