IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/sustdv/v34y2026is1p197-209.html

Designing Community Participation for Mine Closure and Social Transition

Author

Listed:
  • Kamila Svobodova
  • Jo‐Anne Everingham
  • Sarah Mackenzie
  • Kathy Witt

Abstract

As mining‐dependent countries confront the dual challenge of transitioning to low‐carbon economies and recovering from the COVID‐19 pandemic, the imperative to convert resource wealth into long‐term social and economic resilience has never been greater. In these contexts, sustainable development is now widely understood to be achievable only when participation occurs—when beneficiaries become active agents in shaping their futures. This demands more than technical closure planning or economic diversification. It requires inclusive, transparent, and justice‐based governance frameworks. Central to these frameworks is the design and implementation of meaningful community participation in mine closure and social transition. This article presents a structured approach to participatory design, focusing on the questions of who participates, in what, how, and when. Drawing from global practice and the authors' applied experience, we introduce practical guidance to help governments, companies, and communities navigate the complexities of mine closure engagement. To illustrate its application, we examine five examples of suitable participatory processes, each representing different stages, purposes, and levels of engagement. We argue that early, inclusive, and sustained participation enhances the legitimacy, durability, and social acceptance of closure outcomes, particularly when tailored to evolving local contexts. The article contributes to current debates on just transitions, post‐extractive futures, and sustainable development by offering both conceptual insights and practical guidance. It concludes with a call for stronger institutional support, particularly in politically constrained environments, and for companies to shift toward co‐created, community‐led closure planning as a foundation for equitable and sustainable regional transitions.

Suggested Citation

  • Kamila Svobodova & Jo‐Anne Everingham & Sarah Mackenzie & Kathy Witt, 2026. "Designing Community Participation for Mine Closure and Social Transition," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(S1), pages 197-209, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:34:y:2026:i:s1:p:197-209
    DOI: 10.1002/sd.70176
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.70176
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sd.70176?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brereton, David & Flynn, Sharon & Kemp, Deanna, 2024. "An essay on mining and the moral obligation not to harm others," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    2. Fraser, Jocelyn, 2021. "Mining companies and communities: Collaborative approaches to reduce social risk and advance sustainable development," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    3. Laura J. Sonter & Marie C. Dade & James E. M. Watson & Rick K. Valenta, 2020. "Renewable energy production will exacerbate mining threats to biodiversity," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-6, December.
    4. Aleksandra Kozłowska-Woszczycka & Katarzyna Pactwa, 2022. "Social License for Closure—A Participatory Approach to the Management of the Mine Closure Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-26, May.
    5. Richard Parsons & Aleta Lederwasch & Kieren Moffat, 2013. "Clermont Preferred Future: Stakeholder Reflections on a Community Foresight and Planning Initiative," Resources, MDPI, vol. 2(4), pages 1-27, October.
    6. Measham, Thomas & Walker, Jim & Haslam McKenzie, Fiona & Kirby, Jason & Williams, Caroline & D'Urso, Jillian & Littleboy, Anna & Samper, Agnes & Rey, Rebecca & Maybee, Bryan & Brereton, David & Boggs,, 2024. "Beyond closure: A literature review and research agenda for post-mining transitions," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    7. Hilson, Gavin & Murck, Barbara, 2000. "Sustainable development in the mining industry: clarifying the corporate perspective," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 26(4), pages 227-238, December.
    8. Honglin Zhong & Yanxian Li & Jiaying Ding & Benedikt Bruckner & Kuishuang Feng & Laixiang Sun & Christina Prell & Yuli Shan & Klaus Hubacek, 2024. "Global spillover effects of the European Green Deal and plausible mitigation options," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 7(11), pages 1501-1511, November.
    9. Gregory, Gillian H., 2021. "Rendering mine closure governable and constraints to inclusive development in the Andean region," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    10. Sara Bice, 2014. "What Gives You a Social Licence? An Exploration of the Social Licence to Operate in the Australian Mining Industry," Resources, MDPI, vol. 3(1), pages 1-19, January.
    11. Carol Bond & Lisa Kelly, 2021. "Returning land to country: Indigenous engagement in mined land closure and rehabilitation," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 46(1), pages 174-192, February.
    12. Kamila Svobodova & John R. Owen & Deanna Kemp & Vítězslav Moudrý & Éléonore Lèbre & Martin Stringer & Benjamin K. Sovacool, 2022. "Decarbonization, population disruption and resource inventories in the global energy transition," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, December.
    13. Gilbert Silvius & Ron Schipper, 2019. "Planning Project Stakeholder Engagement from a Sustainable Development Perspective," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-22, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Emeka Ndaguba & Lochner Marais, 2024. "A scientometric analysis of mine closure research," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(11), pages 27787-27803, November.
    2. Daly, Christine A. & Grandjambe, Ryan & L’Hommecourt, Jean & Donald, Gillian & Arrobo, Bori & Gerlach, S. Craig & McCarthy, Dan & McIntyre, Don AhnAhnsisi, 2025. "Reclaiming homeland - An evaluation of traditional land use planning in oils sands mine closure and reclamation plans," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    3. Konstantinos Komnitsas, 2020. "Social License to Operate in Mining: Present Views and Future Trends," Resources, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-15, June.
    4. Pouresmaieli, Mahdi & Ataei, Mohammad & Nouri Qarahasanlou, Ali & Barabadi, Abbas, 2024. "Corporate social responsibility in complex systems based on sustainable development," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    5. Marcelo Fuentes & Moira Negrete & Sebastián Herrera‐León & Andrzej Kraslawski, 2024. "Links between the actors and mining activities related to the implementation of sustainable development principles," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(6), pages 6763-6787, December.
    6. Kozłowska-Woszczycka, Aleksandra & Pactwa, Katarzyna & Konieczna-Fuławka, Martyna, 2025. "From black gold to green goals: The uneven path of just transition in Poland," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    7. Anna Szewczyk-Świątek, 2025. "Sustainable Transformation of Post-Mining Areas: Discreet Alliance of Stakeholders in Influencing the Public Perception of Heavy Industry in Germany and Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-33, September.
    8. Endl, Andreas & Tost, Michael & Hitch, Michael & Moser, Peter & Feiel, Susanne, 2021. "Europe's mining innovation trends and their contribution to the sustainable development goals: Blind spots and strong points," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    9. Emblemsvåg, Jan, 2022. "Wind energy is not sustainable when balanced by fossil energy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 305(C).
    10. Daina Paulikas & Steven Katona & Erika Ilves & Saleem H. Ali, 2022. "Deep‐sea nodules versus land ores: A comparative systems analysis of mining and processing wastes for battery‐metal supply chains," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(6), pages 2154-2177, December.
    11. Van Alstine, James & Barkemeyer, Ralf, 2014. "Business and development: Changing discourses in the extractive industries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 4-16.
    12. Diana Turrión & Luna Morcillo & José Antonio Alloza & Alberto Vilagrosa, 2021. "Innovative Techniques for Landscape Recovery after Clay Mining under Mediterranean Conditions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-18, March.
    13. Hanbin Liu & Yujing Yang & Wenting Jiao & Shaobin Wang & Fangqin Cheng, 2022. "A New Assessment Method for the Redevelopment of Closed Coal Mine—A Case Study in Shanxi Province in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-19, August.
    14. Mohammed Banchirigah, Sadia, 2006. "How have reforms fuelled the expansion of artisanal mining? Evidence from sub-Saharan Africa," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 165-171, September.
    15. Vintró, Carla & Fortuny, Jordi & Sanmiquel, Lluís & Freijo, Modesto & Edo, Joaquín, 2012. "Is corporate social responsibility possible in the mining sector? Evidence from Catalan companies," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 118-125.
    16. Witold Kawalec & Robert Król & Natalia Suchorab, 2020. "Regenerative Belt Conveyor versus Haul Truck-Based Transport: Polish Open-Pit Mines Facing Sustainable Development Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-15, November.
    17. Lèbre, Éléonore & Owen, John R. & Kemp, Deanna & Valenta, Rick K., 2022. "Complex orebodies and future global metal supply: An introduction," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    18. Fraser, Jocelyn & Kunz, Nadja C. & Batdorj, Bulgan, 2019. "Can mineral exploration projects create and share value with communities? A case study from Mongolia," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 1-1.
    19. Qiao Yu & Tristan Que & Lara J. Cushing & Gregory Pierce & Ke Shen & Mayank Kejriwal & Yuan Yao & Yifang Zhu, 2025. "Equity and reliability of public electric vehicle charging stations in the United States," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-13, December.
    20. Justice Mensah & John Oti Amoah & Andrew Nketsiah‐Essoun, 2025. "Effects of artisanal gold mining and routes towards sustainable development for a low‐profile mining community in Ghana," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 49(2), pages 1584-1601, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:34:y:2026:i:s1:p:197-209. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1719 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.