IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/sustdv/v34y2026is1p170-182.html

Efficiency and Sustainability in UK Ports: Balancing Operations and Environmental Management

Author

Listed:
  • Jia‐Rong Chen
  • David Adkins
  • Jeong‐Won Choi
  • Min‐Ho Ha
  • Young‐Joon Seo

Abstract

This study uses a slack‐based network model and undesirable output approach to assess the operational and environmental efficiency of eight major UK container ports. To better measure environmental management, pollutants such as sulfur oxides (SOx), nitrogen oxides (NOx), and particulate matter (PM) are considered. The results reveal significant differences in port performance, with the ports of Southampton, London, Tees and Hartlepool ranking highest in both operational and environmental dimensions, while the ports of Hull and Belfast are inefficient. The results also highlight the trade‐off between operational performance and environmental sustainability, indicating that high throughput is not necessarily associated with low emissions. This study provides practical insights for policymakers and port operators and advocates for investment in emission control technologies, stricter regulations, and sustainable practices. By integrating operational and environmental factors, this study provides a framework for sustainable port management and enhances the global competitiveness of UK ports.

Suggested Citation

  • Jia‐Rong Chen & David Adkins & Jeong‐Won Choi & Min‐Ho Ha & Young‐Joon Seo, 2026. "Efficiency and Sustainability in UK Ports: Balancing Operations and Environmental Management," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(S1), pages 170-182, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:34:y:2026:i:s1:p:170-182
    DOI: 10.1002/sd.70169
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.70169
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sd.70169?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:34:y:2026:i:s1:p:170-182. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1719 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.