IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/sustdv/v34y2026is1p1451-1465.html

Generative AI for Sustainable Development in the Construction Industry: Exploring Organizational Adoption Patterns

Author

Listed:
  • Hanjing Zhu
  • Yuxin Feng
  • Bon‐Gang Hwang
  • Xiaoxuan Fan

Abstract

While Generative AI (GenAI) is a critical enabler for achieving key United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in the construction industry, organizations remain hesitant to implement it due to limited awareness of key barriers and the absence of clear adoption strategies. This study aims to (1) identify key barriers and propose strategies for GenAI adoption in the construction industry, and (2) examine how the significance of barriers and the effectiveness of strategies vary across organizations of different types and sizes. Through a systematic literature review and pilot interviews, this study identified 23 barriers and 17 strategies, which were then evaluated using statistical analysis and post‐survey interviews. The findings reveal that “Unclear Legal Liability,” “Lack of Explainability,” and “Lack of Accuracy/Precision” are the most significant barriers, while there is an industry‐wide preference for a passive “wait‐and‐see” stance, prioritizing external, government‐led initiatives over driving internal change for GenAI adoption. The study further uncovers notable differences in barrier significance and strategy effectiveness across organizational contexts. This study provides a structured classification of barriers and strategies, along with comparative insights across organizational types and sizes. Practically, it supports construction organizations in adopting GenAI responsibly and advancing progress toward SDG commitments.

Suggested Citation

  • Hanjing Zhu & Yuxin Feng & Bon‐Gang Hwang & Xiaoxuan Fan, 2026. "Generative AI for Sustainable Development in the Construction Industry: Exploring Organizational Adoption Patterns," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(S1), pages 1451-1465, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:34:y:2026:i:s1:p:1451-1465
    DOI: 10.1002/sd.70246
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.70246
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sd.70246?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:34:y:2026:i:s1:p:1451-1465. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1719 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.