Author
Abstract
The sustainable development goals (SDGs) cannot be achieved in high‐income economies solely provided access to capital, but the fabrication needs to be spread among financial flows, technological advancement, and the quality of institutions. This article will explore the impact of the green finance, represented by the green bonds and environmental protection spending, on sustainable development in the 29 OECD countries during the period between 2015 and 2022, as well as the mediating effect of the artificial intelligence (AI) and renewable energy capacity (RECAP). Based on quarterly panel data and a dynamic econometric model that encompasses both cross‐sectional dependence tests and slope heterogeneity as well as System GMM estimates, we get the results that green finance in and of itself has weak or adverse short‐run impacts on sustainability only. But placed within favorable institutional and innovation environments, it has a better effect. In particular, the green bonds are linked with a higher capacity of renewable energy, whereas the environmental spending is observed to crowd out AI investment in the short‐term. Openness of trade and government spending are always sustainable to development, and rule of law exhibits transitional costs, indicating that initially the reform of the rules might be counterproductive to the advance. These results promote SDGs 7, 9, 13, and 16 because they demonstrate that financial mechanisms can be effective at most when these mechanisms are supported by the effective governance and capacity to innovate. These are the performance based financial transactions, AI ready infrastructure and investment in long term renewable energy that we suggest the policymakers concentrate to better tie the connection between green finance initiatives and the SDG development in developed economies.
Suggested Citation
Qiuya Wu & Elena Bianchi, 2026.
"Can Innovation and Institutional Quality Unlock Green Finance Potential? Lessons From the OECD'S Path to Sustainable Development,"
Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(4), pages 5785-5816, August.
Handle:
RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:34:y:2026:i:4:p:5785-5816
DOI: 10.1002/sd.70648
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:34:y:2026:i:4:p:5785-5816. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1719 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.