Author
Listed:
- Jian Huang
- Thijs de Vries
- Ali Imran
Abstract
Achieving sustainable development in advanced economies requires balancing infrastructure growth and technological innovation with ecological responsibility. This study examines 27 OECD countries from 2000 to 2022 to explore how next‐generation technologies, infrastructure expansion, and regulatory frameworks shape environmental sustainability (ES) in the context of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Using an advanced econometric strategy that combines the Method of Moments Quantile Regression (MMQR), Common Correlated Effects Mean Group (CCEMG), and Cross‐Sectional Autoregressive Distributed Lag (CS‐ARDL) models, the analysis captures both heterogeneous distributional effects and long‐run dynamics. The findings reveal a nonlinear relationship in which competitive industrial performance (CIP) initially supports ES but becomes detrimental at higher levels, emphasizing trade‐offs between industrial growth and ecological balance. Artificial intelligence (AI) and information and communication technologies (ICT) show negative effects at higher quantiles of ES, indicating rebound effects from rapid technological diffusion. However, robustness checks confirm their potential to improve energy efficiency and environmental monitoring over time. In contrast, geothermal energy (GE), natural resource rents (NRR), environmental regulations (ER), and human capital (HC) significantly enhance sustainability outcomes, with ER and HC proving crucial in building resilience during crises such as COVID‐19. These results highlight the importance of strengthening regulatory institutions, prioritizing clean energy investments, and fostering human capital to ensure that technological progress and infrastructure transitions act as drivers of sustainable development rather than sources of ecological strain.
Suggested Citation
Jian Huang & Thijs de Vries & Ali Imran, 2026.
"Navigating the Sustainability Paradox: Technology, Regulation, and Clean Energy Pathways in OECD Economies,"
Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(4), pages 4704-4731, August.
Handle:
RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:34:y:2026:i:4:p:4704-4731
DOI: 10.1002/sd.70582
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:34:y:2026:i:4:p:4704-4731. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1719 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.