IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/sustdv/v34y2026i3p4457-4472.html

Can Sustainable Development Goal Classification Tools Be Trusted? Analysing the Spanish National Research Council Output on Gender Equality

Author

Listed:
  • Núria Bautista‐Puig
  • Daniela De Filippo
  • Borja González‐Albo
  • Fernanda Morillo

Abstract

Evaluating research contributions to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) remains challenging, particularly for SDG 5 (Gender Equality), which is cross‐cutting, thematically complex and apparently underrepresented in scientific output. This study evaluates the abilities and limitations of automated classification systems (Web of Science, Scopus, OpenAlex and OSDG) in identifying SDG 5 related publications, through a case study of the Spanish National Research Council (CSIC) publications between 2018 and 2022. A mixed approach, combining bibliometric analysis and expert review, examined overlaps among sources, alignment with SDG 5 targets and thematic relevance. Results reveal very low agreement across tools, with only 35% of suggested publications validated as truly related. Most addressed only a few specific targets and semantic ambiguities and certain “two‐sided” concepts/areas whose presence did not always indicate alignment with the goal. Findings highlight the need for hybrid approaches that integrate automated detection with expert qualitative evaluation to ensure rigorous SDG evaluation.

Suggested Citation

  • Núria Bautista‐Puig & Daniela De Filippo & Borja González‐Albo & Fernanda Morillo, 2026. "Can Sustainable Development Goal Classification Tools Be Trusted? Analysing the Spanish National Research Council Output on Gender Equality," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(3), pages 4457-4472, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:34:y:2026:i:3:p:4457-4472
    DOI: 10.1002/sd.70563
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.70563
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sd.70563?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:34:y:2026:i:3:p:4457-4472. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1719 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.