Author
Listed:
- Muhammad Ikram
- Jinane Es‐sadki
Abstract
The United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) set a global agenda to advance sustainability by exerting environmental pressures and promoting cleaner production. Achieving these targets depends heavily on the adoption of green technologies, yet several persistent barriers continue to impede the effective implementation of green technologies. Therefore, this study develops an integrated decision support system to assess Green Technology Adoption (GTA) barriers and explore potential strategies to overcome them effectively. After reviewing the literature and consulting with field experts, seven major categories of barriers: institutional, financial, market, technological, regulatory, environmental, and social barriers, and 26 sub‐barriers were identified and analyzed. A Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) was applied to rank the main and sub barriers and then used the Fuzzy VIekriterijumsko KOmpromisno Rangiranje (FVIKOR) method to prioritize the 11 potential solution strategies. The results reveal that financial barriers (FB), technological barriers (TB), and regulatory barriers (RB) are the most pressing, whereas natural resource dependency (EB1), limited institutional capacity (IB3), and climate challenges (EB2) were ranked the most influencing sub‐barriers. Moreover, resilience programs for green tech jobs (SO7) and investment in digital technologies (SO6) ranked the top potential strategic solutions to mitigate the GTA barriers. This study provides actionable guidance for developing economies pursuing green transitions under economic and governance constraints, offering policymakers and practitioners a clear, systematic roadmap for designing resilient sustainability strategies.
Suggested Citation
Muhammad Ikram & Jinane Es‐sadki, 2026.
"Assessing Barriers to the Adoption of Green Technologies in Developing Countries by Using an Integrated Decision‐Making System,"
Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(3), pages 4309-4333, June.
Handle:
RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:34:y:2026:i:3:p:4309-4333
DOI: 10.1002/sd.70571
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:34:y:2026:i:3:p:4309-4333. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1719 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.