IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/sustdv/v34y2026i3p4115-4126.html

Strategic Environmental Assessment for Sustainable Mining in Africa: A Kenyan Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Amani G. Rweyendela
  • Noah M. Pauline

Abstract

As global demand for mineral resources grows, resource‐rich countries are seeking tools to promote sustainable mining. Strategic environmental assessment (SEA) offers a promising framework, yet evidence of its effectiveness in Africa remains limited. This study evaluates the procedural effectiveness of Kenya's mining sector SEA, the first of its kind in East Africa. Using qualitative content analysis, the SEA report was assessed against international best‐practice criteria across preassessment, assessment, postassessment, and participation phases, and interpreted through a political‐economic mobilization (PEM) lens. The results reveal major procedural weaknesses, including an unclear sustainability vision, weak baseline data, limited consideration of alternatives and uncertainties, vague implementation guidance, and inadequate stakeholder engagement. These findings highlight the risks of SEA being reduced to a formal requirement rather than a strategic tool. The study underscores the need for more politically informed and strategically oriented SEA practices to support sustainable mining sector development in Kenya and similar contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Amani G. Rweyendela & Noah M. Pauline, 2026. "Strategic Environmental Assessment for Sustainable Mining in Africa: A Kenyan Case Study," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(3), pages 4115-4126, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:34:y:2026:i:3:p:4115-4126
    DOI: 10.1002/sd.70502
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.70502
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sd.70502?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:34:y:2026:i:3:p:4115-4126. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1719 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.