Author
Abstract
This study identifies and prioritizes essential criteria for sustainable tourism in China using a two‐phased Multi‐Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) framework that integrates the Delphi technique with the Best‐Worst Method (BWM). Eco‐tourism is recognized as a vital pathway to balance tourism demand with sustainability and economic growth. Despite extensive literature, significant gaps remain in systematically prioritizing sustainability factors within specific national contexts. We hypothesize that structured expert‐based evaluation can effectively identify and rank the most influential factors to guide policy and planning. To test this, 41 experts participated in the Delphi phase and 9 experts in the BWM prioritization process, enabling a rigorous evaluation of environmental, social, and economic dimensions. The findings highlight biodiversity protection, cultural asset preservation, and equitable economic distribution as critical concerns. The BWM analysis demonstrated strong consistency in pairwise comparisons, reinforcing the robustness of the results. Practical recommendations are offered to help policymakers optimize tourism revenues while mitigating ecological and cultural impacts. Future research should extend this framework to other contexts and incorporate emerging drivers such as technological innovation and climate‐related uncertainty. Overall, the study demonstrates that combining expert consensus with robust prioritization methods provides a replicable model for advancing sustainable tourism governance in China and beyond.
Suggested Citation
Jinjie Li, 2026.
"Sustainable Tourism Development Using Multi‐Criteria Decision Making in China Tourism Destination,"
Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(3), pages 3672-3688, June.
Handle:
RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:34:y:2026:i:3:p:3672-3688
DOI: 10.1002/sd.70517
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:34:y:2026:i:3:p:3672-3688. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1719 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.