Author
Abstract
Southeastern and Southern Asian countries endure high the issue of carbon curse, which necessitates them to become environmentally sustainable by overcoming this curse in due course. Hence, considering 12 countries from these two Asian regions, this study explores whether geopolitical dispute settlement enables them to improve their carbon curse situations. Notably, this study considers an external conflict resolution‐based measure of geopolitical dispute settlement and assesses its impacts on a holistic carbon curse index that emphasizes reductions in carbon emission growth rates and intensity levels. The analysis period ranges from 2000 to 2022 and uses (non)parametric panel data estimators. Accordingly, findings affirm that geopolitical dispute settlement directly reduces the carbon curse, especially across Southeast Asia and in relatively less developed and low carbon curse‐experiencing countries. Additionally, geopolitical dispute settlement indirectly offsets the carbon curse‐exacerbating impacts of natural resources. Additionally, renewable energy consumption fails to lessen the carbon curse, irrespective of regional location, development status, and the severity of the curses faced. Besides, foreign direct investment inflow worsens carbon curse situations, irrespective of the development status, and particularly in countries facing moderate to high degrees of carbon curse. Moreover, energy optimization exacerbates carbon curses, especially across South Asia and in the relatively more developed and low carbon curse‐facing countries. Furthermore, financial development does not influence carbon curse as a whole, but it reduces the curse in relatively wealthier countries. Finally, corruption control efforts fail to lessen the curse, irrespective of the existing carbon curse‐facing level. Therefore, the above findings have critical policy implications in terms of overcoming the carbon curse issue throughout Southeast and South Asia.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:34:y:2026:i:2:p:2780-2801. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1719 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.