Author
Abstract
Understanding how happiness relates to resource consumption requires considering not only domestic environmental impacts but also the broader transnational effects embedded in global trade. To address this gap, this study introduces the Consumption Footprint–Happiness Ratio (CHR), a visual analytic metric that captures the intensity of complete resource use required to sustain a unit of happiness. CHR draws an analogy between excessive resource consumption and “abdominal obesity,” providing an intuitive way to visualize countries' overreliance on transnational consumption. Using data from 121 countries between 2015 and 2024, the study compares the correlation between happiness and two types of environmental footprints: the domestic footprint (DF), which accounts only for internal resource use, and the complete consumption footprint (CF), which includes both domestic production and spillover effects from international trade. The results show that happiness is significantly more strongly associated with CF than with DF, particularly for raw material use, primary energy, fossil fuel depletion, and climate change—factors that undermine multiple Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), especially SDG 12 (Responsible Consumption and Production) and SDG 13 (Climate Action). Moreover, negative spillovers from advanced economies' pursuit of happiness hinder less‐developed countries' progress on SDG 11 (Sustainable Cities and Communities) and weaken SDG 17 (Partnerships for the Goals). CHR visualizations map the “abdominal shapes” of 121 countries over time, offering a novel tool for monitoring their trajectory toward sustainable happiness. The paper concludes by discussing global trends, behavioral drivers, and policy implications, offering insights into the intersection of happiness and sustainable consumption.
Suggested Citation
Chong‐Wen Chen, 2026.
"Can Happiness Be Sustainable? Monitoring Global Consumption Footprints From 2015 to 2024,"
Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(2), pages 2592-2614, April.
Handle:
RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:34:y:2026:i:2:p:2592-2614
DOI: 10.1002/sd.70470
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:34:y:2026:i:2:p:2592-2614. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1719 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.