IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/sustdv/v34y2026i2p1719-1733.html

A Method for Assessing the Risks to Sustainability Posed by Process Operations

Author

Listed:
  • Richard C. Darton
  • Colin J. Axon

Abstract

We present a framework for assessing the risks to sustainability posed by any given set of processes. The objective is to improve sustainability by enabling better decision‐making in policy and business contexts. The framework can be applied to any system of processes where available information supports discovery and quantification of sustainability‐risk, defined as risk to the ability of future generations to meet their needs. Processes are screened to identify sustainability‐risks, which are scored on a common scale to avoid arbitrary weighting factors. The method yields an overall risk score for the system, and an analysis of where and how sustainability‐risk arises. We demonstrate the method by applying it to the system that provides for the UK's production and use of liquid biofuels. A set of 18 distinct causes of risk is discovered, and impacts are assessed by triple‐bottom line accounting. The innovation risk optimism bias is the highest‐scoring cause of risk, followed by price volatility associated with competition between markets for bio‐feedstocks. In this case, the wide variety of risk types and severity, and scale of action, suggests that promoting sustainability requires a tailored response to address specific risks.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard C. Darton & Colin J. Axon, 2026. "A Method for Assessing the Risks to Sustainability Posed by Process Operations," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(2), pages 1719-1733, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:34:y:2026:i:2:p:1719-1733
    DOI: 10.1002/sd.70423
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.70423
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sd.70423?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:34:y:2026:i:2:p:1719-1733. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1719 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.