IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/sustdv/v34y2026i1p749-767.html

The Measurement‐Impact Gap: A Bibliometric Diagnosis of Development Finance Institutions and SDG Research

Author

Listed:
  • Juan Martinez Alvarez
  • Simon Fernandez‐Vazquez
  • Jiajun Xu
  • Rafael Rosillo

Abstract

The role of Development Finance Institutions (DFIs) in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) is a topic of growing scholarly importance. While existing literature has mapped the thematic scope of this field, a critical diagnosis of its intellectual structure and inherent biases is missing. This study addresses that gap by using a bibliometric analysis of 271 articles from the Web of Science database not simply to describe the literature, but to critically evaluate its structure and identify its foundational weaknesses. Our analysis reveals a field characterized by a significant measurement–impact gap, a disconnection between research focused on DFI financial mechanisms and studies evaluating their ultimate development outcomes. We find this gap is driven by structural factors, including a thematic skew towards health (SDG 3) influenced by high‐impact external studies and a scarcity of technical research due to data access constraints. By diagnosing these structural limitations, this paper provides the first critical synthesis of the DFI–SDG literature and proposes a targeted research agenda designed to bridge the gap between analysing financial instruments and measuring their real‐world impact.

Suggested Citation

  • Juan Martinez Alvarez & Simon Fernandez‐Vazquez & Jiajun Xu & Rafael Rosillo, 2026. "The Measurement‐Impact Gap: A Bibliometric Diagnosis of Development Finance Institutions and SDG Research," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(1), pages 749-767, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:34:y:2026:i:1:p:749-767
    DOI: 10.1002/sd.70289
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.70289
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sd.70289?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Galindo, Arturo J. & Panizza, Ugo, 2018. "The cyclicality of international public sector borrowing in developing countries: Does the lender matter?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 119-135.
    2. María del Carmen Calatrava Moreno & Thomas Auzinger & Hannes Werthner, 2016. "On the uncertainty of interdisciplinarity measurements due to incomplete bibliographic data," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 107(1), pages 213-232, April.
    3. Waltman, Ludo & van Eck, Nees Jan & Wouters, Paul, 2013. "Counting publications and citations: Is more always better?," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 7(3), pages 635-641.
    4. Qianhua Liu & Ka-Ching Chan & Ranga Chimhundu, 2024. "Fintech research: systematic mapping, classification, and future directions," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 10(1), pages 1-33, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Martin Ricker, 2017. "Letter to the Editor: About the quality and impact of scientific articles," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 111(3), pages 1851-1855, June.
    2. Muneer M. Alshater & Rim El Khoury & Marah Ferdous & Indri Supriani, 2026. "Reward-based crowdfunding: A hybrid review of trends, opportunities, and future research directions," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 12(1), pages 1-64, December.
    3. R. Fileto Maciel & P. Saskia Bayerl & Marta Macedo Kerr Pinheiro, 2019. "Technical research innovations of the US national security system," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 120(2), pages 539-565, August.
    4. McHugh, Christopher A., 2023. "Competitive conditions in development finance," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    5. Gordon Rogers & Martin Szomszor & Jonathan Adams, 2020. "Sample size in bibliometric analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 125(1), pages 777-794, October.
    6. Letycja Sołoducho-Pelc & Adam Sulich, 2022. "Natural Environment Protection Strategies and Green Management Style: Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-25, August.
    7. Dag W. Aksnes & Liv Langfeldt & Paul Wouters, 2019. "Citations, Citation Indicators, and Research Quality: An Overview of Basic Concepts and Theories," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(1), pages 21582440198, February.
    8. Minh Tam Tammy Schlosky & Serkan Karadas & Sterling Raskie, 2024. "ChatGPT, Help! I Am in Financial Trouble," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-39, June.
    9. Degl’Innocenti, Marta & Frigerio, Marco & Zhou, Si, 2022. "Development banks and the syndicate structure: Evidence from a world sample," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 99-120.
    10. Brito, Ricardo & Rodríguez-Navarro, Alonso, 2018. "Research assessment by percentile-based double rank analysis," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 12(1), pages 315-329.
    11. Fleiss, Pablo, 2021. "Multilateral development banks in Latin America: Recent trends, the response to the pandemic, and the forthcoming role," Studies and Perspectives – ECLAC Office in Washington 46916, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    12. Morretta, Valentina & Vurchio, Davide & Carrazza, Stefano, 2022. "The socio-economic value of scientific publications: The case of Earth Observation satellites," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    13. Mirco Balatti & M. Ayhan Kose & Kate McKinnon & Edoardo Palombo & Naotaka Sugawara & Guillermo Verduzco-Bustos & Dana Vorisek, 2025. "From Tailwinds to Headwinds: Emerging and Developing Economies in the Twenty-First Century," CAMA Working Papers 2025-44, Centre for Applied Macroeconomic Analysis, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University.
    14. Henk F. Moed & Gali Halevi, 2015. "Multidimensional assessment of scholarly research impact," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 66(10), pages 1988-2002, October.
    15. Morretta, Valentina & Florio, Massimo & Landoni, Matteo, 2023. "The social value of Earth observation: A new evaluation framework for public high-tech infrastructures," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 407-419.
    16. Chiara Broccolini & Giulia Lotti & Alessandro Maffioli & Andrea F Presbitero & Rodolfo Stucchi, 2021. "Mobilization Effects of Multilateral Development Banks," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 35(2), pages 521-543.
    17. Gong, Di & Xu, Jiajun & Yan, Jianye, 2023. "National development banks and loan contract terms: Evidence from syndicated loans," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    18. Avellán, Leopoldo & Galindo, Arturo J. & Gómez, Tomás & Lotti, Giulia, 2024. "The cyclicality of official bilateral lending: Which cycle do flows follow?," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    19. Wong, Ka Lok & Manger, Mark & Panizza, Ugo, 2026. "Determinants of Sovereign Bond Issuance in Emerging Markets," CEPR Discussion Papers 21251, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    20. Roland Barthel & Roman Seidl, 2017. "Interdisciplinary Collaboration between Natural and Social Sciences – Status and Trends Exemplified in Groundwater Research," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(1), pages 1-27, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:34:y:2026:i:1:p:749-767. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1719 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.