Author
Abstract
The differential impacts of green transition policies—renewable energy, green trade, environmentally friendly technologies, and environmental taxes—on ecological sustainability are critical for policy design. This study examines these effects across 32 OECD countries from 2000 to 2022. Distinct from prior research, it employs a two‐step approach combining club convergence analysis and a dynamic system generalized method of moments (GMM) estimator to address heterogeneity and endogeneity, offering a novel methodological contribution. Convergence analysis reveals that OECD countries do not move toward a single steady‐state ecological footprint; instead, three distinct convergence clubs emerge, each with unique environmental trajectories. Building on this divergence, the study analyzes the impacts of green trade, environmentally friendly technologies, renewable energy, environmental taxes, and economic growth on ecological footprint within each club. Full‐panel results show that green trade, environmentally friendly technologies, renewable energy, and environmental taxes reduce ecological footprint, though effect sizes are modest compared with the consistently strong positive impact of economic growth. Club‐specific results reveal asymmetries: Club 1 benefits mainly from green trade and environmental taxes but remains vulnerable to growth pressures. Club 2 achieves its largest gains through renewable energy, while environmental taxes have limited influence. Club 3 relies on environmentally friendly technologies, with green trade showing no significant effect. These findings highlight the need for club‐specific environmental strategies and challenge the assumption of OECD homogeneity in sustainability outcomes. The study provides novel empirical evidence and actionable insights for aligning ecological sustainability with green transition policies and economic growth.
Suggested Citation
Volkan Bektaş, 2026.
"Ecological Sustainability in OECD Countries: The Divergent Effects of Green Trade, Environmentally Friendly Technologies, Renewable Energy, and Environmental Taxation,"
Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(1), pages 376-391, February.
Handle:
RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:34:y:2026:i:1:p:376-391
DOI: 10.1002/sd.70281
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:34:y:2026:i:1:p:376-391. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1719 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.