IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/sustdv/v33y2025is1p459-474.html

Political Science's Engagement With the Sustainability Challenge: A Semi‐Systematic Review of the Voluntary Sustainability Standards (VSS) Governance Literature

Author

Listed:
  • Fred Gale
  • Daniel Goodwin
  • Heather Lovell
  • Hannah Murphy
  • Kim Beasy
  • Marion Schoen

Abstract

The implications of sustainable development are far reaching, and yet many areas of academic scholarship were slow to deeply engage with it. This is a problem because, in practical terms, it can generate a false sense of calm, of business as usual, and a failure to rise to the integrative challenge of balancing the trade‐offs across sustainability's economic, social, and environmental dimensions. Conceptually it is also problematic as, properly understood, sustainability is highly disruptive of many longstanding bodies of theory. In this article we demonstrate how a lack of attention to sustainability's deeper meanings operates within the discipline of Political Science, focusing on private governance through Voluntary Sustainability Standards (VSS). We use a semi‐systematic literature review to generate a corpus of highly cited literature to reveal how the discipline of political science drew on ill‐defined and relative conceptions of sustainability during VSS' formative period. In the Conclusion, we consider the implications of this for contemporary politics and policy and propose possible remedies.

Suggested Citation

  • Fred Gale & Daniel Goodwin & Heather Lovell & Hannah Murphy & Kim Beasy & Marion Schoen, 2025. "Political Science's Engagement With the Sustainability Challenge: A Semi‐Systematic Review of the Voluntary Sustainability Standards (VSS) Governance Literature," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(S1), pages 459-474, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:33:y:2025:i:s1:p:459-474
    DOI: 10.1002/sd.70003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.70003
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sd.70003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:33:y:2025:i:s1:p:459-474. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1719 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.