IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/sustdv/v33y2025is1p1472-1481.html

Do Patents on Environmental Technologies Truly Facilitate the Green Transition in Japan? A Pathway to the 2050 Net‐Zero Emission Target

Author

Listed:
  • Emrah Sofuoğlu

Abstract

In the context of the Paris Agreement, many governments have been tackling climate change and trying to achieve net‐zero emission targets by 2050, since these targets are vital to limiting global warming to 2°C for a sustainable planet. This study explores the linkage between environmental sustainability and environmental patents in Japan. For this purpose, the study covers 1975–2021 and employs novel econometric approaches such as the Fourier unit root, Fourier ARDL cointegration, and Fourier‐based long‐term coefficient techniques. As a result of the empirical findings, we first capture a long‐run cointegration relationship between environmental sustainability, environmental patents, economic growth, and energy consumption. We unexpectedly discovered empirical evidence that contradicts the existing literature. According to the Fourier‐based long‐term coefficient results, environmental patents, economic growth, and energy consumption adversely affect environmental quality. Therefore, we have three main interpretations of the findings. (i) Contrary to expectations, patents on environmental technologies adversely impact environmental sustainability. (ii) Japan has not yet achieved a decoupling between economic growth and CO2 emissions. (iii) The negative impact of environmental patents on environmental sustainability reveals that environmental patents have yet to have any influential power in achieving net‐zero emission targets. In addition, environmental patent strategies do not help emission reduction in Japan. Therefore, if policymakers emphasize long‐term environmental patent policies, they might establish an additional strategy to achieve net‐zero targets, which is crucial for mitigating possible emission gaps. These findings suggest that Japanese policymakers should support effective environmental patents to achieve the net‐zero emission target by 2050.

Suggested Citation

  • Emrah Sofuoğlu, 2025. "Do Patents on Environmental Technologies Truly Facilitate the Green Transition in Japan? A Pathway to the 2050 Net‐Zero Emission Target," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(S1), pages 1472-1481, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:33:y:2025:i:s1:p:1472-1481
    DOI: 10.1002/sd.70074
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.70074
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sd.70074?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xu, Deyi & Abbas, Shah & Rafique, Kalsoom & Ali, Najabat, 2023. "The race to net-zero emissions: Can green technological innovation and environmental regulation be the potential pathway to net-zero emissions?," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    2. Motohashi, Kazuyuki & Ikeuchi, Kenta & Kwon, Seokbeom, 2025. "Impact of national university patenting on innovation: Researcher analysis in Japan," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    3. Gallant, A. Ronald & Souza, Geraldo, 1991. "On the asymptotic normality of Fourier flexible form estimates," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 50(3), pages 329-353, December.
    4. Rennings, Klaus, 2000. "Redefining innovation -- eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 319-332, February.
    5. Niklas Höhne & Matthew J. Gidden & Michel Elzen & Frederic Hans & Claire Fyson & Andreas Geiges & M. Louise Jeffery & Sofia Gonzales-Zuñiga & Silke Mooldijk & William Hare & Joeri Rogelj, 2021. "Wave of net zero emission targets opens window to meeting the Paris Agreement," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 11(10), pages 820-822, October.
    6. M. Hashem Pesaran & Yongcheol Shin & Richard J. Smith, 2001. "Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 16(3), pages 289-326.
    7. Li Chunling & Javed Ahmed Memon & Tiep Le Thanh & Minhaj Ali & Dervis Kirikkaleli, 2021. "The Impact of Public-Private Partnership Investment in Energy and Technological Innovation on Ecological Footprint: The Case of Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-16, September.
    8. Franck Aggeri, 1999. "Environmental policies and innovation : a knowledge-based perspective on cooperative approaches," Post-Print halshs-00644610, HAL.
    9. Jun Wen & Waheed Ali & Jamal Hussain & Nadeem Akhtar Khan & Hadi Hussain & Najabat Ali & Rizwan Akhtar, 2022. "Dynamics between green innovation and environmental quality: new insights into South Asian economies," Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, Springer;Fondazione Edison, vol. 39(2), pages 543-565, July.
    10. Razzaq, Asif & Sharif, Arshian & Ozturk, Ilhan & Skare, Marinko, 2023. "Asymmetric influence of digital finance, and renewable energy technology innovation on green growth in China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 310-319.
    11. Popp, David, 2005. "Lessons from patents: Using patents to measure technological change in environmental models," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(2-3), pages 209-226, August.
    12. Walter Enders & Junsoo Lee, 2012. "A Unit Root Test Using a Fourier Series to Approximate Smooth Breaks," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 74(4), pages 574-599, August.
    13. Berna Serener & Dervis Kirikkaleli & Kwaku Addai, 2022. "Patents on Environmental Technologies, Financial Development, and Environmental Degradation in Sweden: Evidence from Novel Fourier-Based Approaches," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-19, December.
    14. Grossman, G.M & Krueger, A.B., 1991. "Environmental Impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement," Papers 158, Princeton, Woodrow Wilson School - Public and International Affairs.
    15. Ralf Becker & Walter Enders & Junsoo Lee, 2006. "A Stationarity Test in the Presence of an Unknown Number of Smooth Breaks," Journal of Time Series Analysis, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(3), pages 381-409, May.
    16. Aggeri, Franck, 1999. "Environmental policies and innovation: A knowledge-based perspective on cooperative approaches," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 28(7), pages 699-717, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Liu, Yishuang & Dong, Hanmin, 2026. "Barrier or driver: Patent thickets in the path of technological transition," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shahbaz, Muhammad & Nasir, Muhammad Ali & Roubaud, David, 2018. "Environmental degradation in France: The effects of FDI, financial development, and energy innovations," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 843-857.
    2. Ugur Korkut Pata & Emrah Sofuoglu & Zahoor Ahmed & Oktay Kizilkaya, 2024. "Eco‐innovation and environmental sustainability in Germany: An empirical approach with smooth structural shifts," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 48(1), pages 154-170, February.
    3. Marei Elbadri & Salah Bsikre & Osama Alamari & Mehmet Balcilar, 2023. "Nexus between renewable energy consumption, economic growth, and CO2 emissions in Algeria: New evidence from the Fourier‐Bootstrap ARDL approach," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 47(3), pages 393-412, August.
    4. Khyati Kathuria & Nand Kumar, 2022. "Are exports and imports of India’s trading partners cointegrated? Evidence from Fourier bootstrap ARDL procedure," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 62(3), pages 1177-1191, March.
    5. Pinget, Amandine, 2016. "Spécificités des déterminants des innovations environnementales : une approche appliquée aux PME [Specificities of determinants for environmental innovation : an approach applied to SMEs]," MPRA Paper 80108, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Muhammad Farhan Bashir & Benjiang MA & Muhammad Shahbaz & Zhilun Jiao, 2020. "The nexus between environmental tax and carbon emissions with the roles of environmental technology and financial development," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-20, November.
    7. He, Qiao & Xie, Henglang & Zhu, Yichang & Huang, Lingyu, 2024. "The impact of natural resource, information and communication technology adoption, and economic expansion on financial development in post COVID era," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    8. Remy Jonkam Oben & Rabiu Abubakar & Mehdi Seraj & Şerife Zihni Eyüpoğlu & Fezile Özdamlı, 2025. "Financial development and climate change in Morocco: symmetric and asymmetric environmental effects," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 5(12), pages 1-41, December.
    9. Ersin Yavuz & Emre Kilic & Abdullah Emre Caglar, 2024. "A new hypothesis for the unemployment-environment dilemma: is the environmental Phillips curve valid in the framework of load capacity factor in Turkiye?," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(11), pages 29475-29492, November.
    10. Akın Fatih, 2026. "The Relationship Between External Debt and Environmental Quality in Türkiye: A Fractional Frequency Fourier ARDL Bounds Test Approach," South East European Journal of Economics and Business, Sciendo, vol. 21(1), pages 87-101.
    11. Ismail Demirdag & Mehmet Ulug & Salih Bortecine Avci & Abdullah Emre Caglar, 2025. "Understanding the Behavior of High‐Tech and Non‐High‐Tech Firms on Environmental Sustainability: New Evidence From the United States," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(4), pages 5119-5132, July.
    12. Enders, Walter & Li, Jing, 2015. "Trend-cycle decomposition allowing for multiple smooth structural changes in the trend of US real GDP," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 71-81.
    13. Nighat Firdous & Kashif Raza Abbasi & Asma Salman & Cumhur Sahin & Amir Hamza, 2026. "Sustainable development in Pakistan: explore the influence of institutions, industrialization, and tourism on consumption and territory-based emissions," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 28(2), pages 3141-3174, February.
    14. Hasanov, Fakhri J. & Aliyev, Ruslan & Taskin, Dilvin & Suleymanov, Elchin, 2023. "Oil rents and non-oil economic growth in CIS oil exporters. The role of financial development," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    15. Fethi, Sami & Rahuma, Abdulhamid, 2020. "The impact of eco-innovation on CO2 emission reductions: Evidence from selected petroleum companies," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 108-115.
    16. Imtiaz, Amir & Javid, Snober, 2023. "Resource curse or blessings hypothesis in Pakistan: The role of financial development and oil prices in era of globalization," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(PA).
    17. Tsong, Ching-Chuan & Wu, Chien-Wei & Chiu, Hsien-Hung & Lee, Cheng-Feng, 2013. "Covariate unit root tests under structural change and asymmetric STAR dynamics," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 101-112.
    18. Shabir Mohsin Hashmi & Xuyou Yu & Qasim Raza Syed & Li Rong, 2024. "Testing the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis amidst climate policy uncertainty: sectoral analysis using the novel Fourier ARDL approach," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(7), pages 16503-16522, July.
    19. Chao Tu & Yingfang Shi, 2023. "Market-Incentive Environmental Regulation and the Quality of Corporate Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-17, March.
    20. Zhou, Bingjun & Huang, Yan & Gao, Ke & Luo, Chunyang, 2024. "How geopolitical risk and economic policy uncertainty impact coal, natural gas, and oil rent? Evidence from China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:33:y:2025:i:s1:p:1472-1481. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1719 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.