IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/sustdv/v33y2025i6p8969-8983.html

Do Female Directors Bridge Sustainability and Profitability? Evidence From MENA Firms

Author

Listed:
  • Ines Kateb

Abstract

This study explores the nexus between carbon performance, gender diversity on corporate boards, and financial outcomes within the context of emerging MENA economies. Grounded in stakeholder theory and resource dependence theory, it examines whether female board representation serves as a mediating mechanism in the relationship between carbon reduction efforts and firm financial performance. Using a panel of 94 non‐financial firms from 2015 to 2022, the study employs two‐stage least squares (2SLS) to address endogeneity concerns and structural equation modeling (SEM) to assess both direct and indirect relationships. The empirical results reveal a positive and significant association between carbon performance and firm value, particularly in market‐based measures. However, the mediating role of female directors appears limited, with partial attenuation of the carbon–finance link, suggesting a modest and context‐dependent influence. These findings challenge the assumption of universally positive effects of gender diversity on firm outcomes and highlight the constraints faced by women in corporate governance across the MENA region. By offering rare evidence from under‐researched economies, this study contributes to sustainability and governance scholarship and emphasizes the need for inclusive governance mechanisms that go beyond symbolic representation. Strengthening the strategic role of female directors is essential to advancing both environmental and financial sustainability in transitional markets.

Suggested Citation

  • Ines Kateb, 2025. "Do Female Directors Bridge Sustainability and Profitability? Evidence From MENA Firms," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(6), pages 8969-8983, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:33:y:2025:i:6:p:8969-8983
    DOI: 10.1002/sd.70138
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.70138
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sd.70138?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Altunbas, Yener & Gambacorta, Leonardo & Reghezza, Alessio & Velliscig, Giulio, 2022. "Does gender diversity in the workplace mitigate climate change?," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    2. Siddique, Md Abubakar & Akhtaruzzaman, Md & Rashid, Afzalur & Hammami, Helmi, 2021. "Carbon disclosure, carbon performance and financial performance: International evidence," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    3. Fortune Ganda, 2018. "The effect of carbon performance on corporate financial performance in a growing economy," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 14(4), pages 895-916, September.
    4. Adams, Renée B. & Ferreira, Daniel, 2009. "Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 94(2), pages 291-309, November.
    5. C. José García Martín & Begoña Herrero, 2020. "Do board characteristics affect environmental performance? A study of EU firms," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1), pages 74-94, January.
    6. Fan, Pengda & Qian, Xuepeng & Wang, Jian, 2023. "Does gender diversity matter? Female directors and firm carbon emissions in Japan," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    7. Caspar Rose, 2007. "Does female board representation influence firm performance? The Danish evidence," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(2), pages 404-413, March.
    8. Nuria Reguera-Alvarado & Pilar Fuentes & Joaquina Laffarga, 2017. "Does Board Gender Diversity Influence Financial Performance? Evidence from Spain," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 141(2), pages 337-350, March.
    9. Timo Busch & Stefan Lewandowski, 2018. "Corporate Carbon and Financial Performance: A Meta‐analysis," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 22(4), pages 745-759, August.
    10. Ines Kateb, 2024. "Reporting lag in the GCC region: exploring the nexus of earnings management and IFRS transition," International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 32(4), pages 685-708, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qingxia (Jenny) Wang, 2023. "Financial effects of carbon risk and carbon disclosure: A review," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(4), pages 4175-4219, December.
    2. Dewan Muktadir‐Al‐Mukit & Firoz Haroon Bhaiyat, 2024. "Impact of corporate governance diversity on carbon emission under environmental policy via the mandatory nonfinancial reporting regulation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 1397-1417, February.
    3. Neji Al-Eid Omri & Abdulhameed Mohanna Alfaleh, 2024. "The effects of boardroom gender diversity on corporate performance: empirical evidence from a sample of European listed companies," Business Economics, Palgrave Macmillan;National Association for Business Economics, vol. 59(2), pages 86-100, April.
    4. Ammar Ali Gull & Tanveer Ahsan & Sabri Boubaker & Fabiana Roberto, 2026. "Women on Board and Climate Change: An Illustration Through Greenhouse Gas Emissions," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(1), pages 1302-1332, January.
    5. Frank Kwabi & Samuel Fulgence & Gbenga Adamolekun, 2024. "CEO hubris and corporate carbon footprint: The role of gender diversity," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(8), pages 8102-8125, December.
    6. Pradhan, Rudra P. & Samarakoon, SMRK & Sarathkumara, SMNN, 2026. "Gender representation in Indian corporate reports: A textual analytics approach," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    7. Um‐E‐Roman Fayyaz & Raja Nabeel‐Ud‐Din Jalal & Michelina Venditti & Antonio Minguez‐Vera, 2023. "Diverse boards and firm performance: The role of environmental, social and governance disclosure," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(3), pages 1457-1472, May.
    8. Sultan Sikandar Mirza & Muhammad Ansar Majeed & Tanveer Ahsan, 2020. "Board gender diversity, competitive pressure and investment efficiency in Chinese private firms," Post-Print hal-02956320, HAL.
    9. Shaista Wasiuzzaman & Effiezal Aswadi Abdul Wahab, 2025. "Board gender diversity and environmental, social and governance (ESG) disclosure: assessing the moderating role of country-level accountability and governance," Pacific Accounting Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 37(3), pages 420-454, May.
    10. Mahdi Salehi & Grzegorz Zimon, 2021. "The Effect of Intellectual Capital and Board Characteristics on Value Creation and Growth," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-16, July.
    11. Đặng, Rey & Houanti, L’Hocine & Reddy, Krishna & Simioni, Michel, 2020. "Does board gender diversity influence firm profitability? A control function approach," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 168-181.
    12. Anda Adelina Suciu & Dragoș Păun & Florin Sebastian Duma, 2021. "Sustainability of Financial Performance in Relation to Gender Diverse Boards: A Comparative Analysis of French and Romanian Listed Companies on Stock Exchanges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-20, September.
    13. Tleubayev, Alisher & Bobojonov, Ihtiyor & Gagalyuk, Taras & Glauben, Thomas, 2020. "Board gender diversity and firm performance: evidence from the Russian agri-food industry," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 23(01).
    14. Laura Cabeza-García & Esther B. Brío & Carlos Rueda, 2021. "The moderating effect of innovation on the gender and performance relationship in the outset of the gender revolution," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 755-778, April.
    15. Anaïs Périlleux & Ariane Szafarz, 2022. "Women in the boardroom: a bottom–up approach to the trickle-down effect," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 58(4), pages 1783-1800, April.
    16. Viput Ongsakul & Anutchanat Jaroenjitrkam & Sirimon Treepongkaruna & Pornsit Jiraporn, 2022. "Does board gender diversity reduce ‘CEO luck’?," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(1), pages 243-260, March.
    17. Sultan Sikandar Mirza & Muhammad Ansar Majeed & Tanveer Ahsan, 2020. "Board gender diversity, competitive pressure and investment efficiency in Chinese private firms," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 10(3), pages 417-440, September.
    18. Aruoriwo Marian Chijoke-Mgbame & Agyenim Boateng & Chijoke Oscar Mgbame, 2020. "Board gender diversity, audit committee and financial performance: evidence from Nigeria," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(3), pages 262-286, July.
    19. Franziska Handschumacher & Willi Ceschinski, 2020. "Besteht ein Zusammenhang zwischen der Gender-Diversity und Überwachungseffektivität des Aufsichtsrats? Eine empirische Analyse deutscher börsennotierter Unternehmen [Is There a Link Between Gender Diversity and Supervisory Board’s Monitoring Effec," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 72(2), pages 213-251, June.
    20. Jean-Michel Sahut & Rey Dang & L'Hocine Houanti & Nhu Tuyen Le, 2020. "Women on corporate boards, stated-owned enterprises and firm performance: Evidence from Vietnam and quantile regression," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 40(3), pages 2538-2549.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:33:y:2025:i:6:p:8969-8983. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1719 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.