IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/sustdv/v33y2025i6p8768-8785.html

Patent Systems and Carbon Dioxide Emissions: Short and Long Run Perspectives on Economic Development and Sustainability

Author

Listed:
  • Constantinos Alexiou

Abstract

This study explores the relationship between patent system strength and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions across 46 developed and developing countries from 1998 to 2017 using Fixed Effects (FE) and Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) models. The findings reveal that stronger patent regimes in developed countries are initially associated with higher emissions, suggesting that innovation may first drive industrial growth before transitioning to cleaner technologies. In developing economies, this effect is weaker, likely due to potentially lower innovation capacity and dependence on imported technologies. The findings refine the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) hypothesis by illustrating how IPRs can shape its trajectory. Additional factors—such as renewable energy use, which consistently reduces emissions, trade openness and urbanization, which yield mixed and positive effects, respectively—highlight the complexity of the emissions‐patent nexus. We conclude that patent strength alone cannot deliver emissions reductions; complementary policies such as renewable energy support, carbon pricing, and technology sharing are essential to align innovation systems with climate goals.

Suggested Citation

  • Constantinos Alexiou, 2025. "Patent Systems and Carbon Dioxide Emissions: Short and Long Run Perspectives on Economic Development and Sustainability," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(6), pages 8768-8785, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:33:y:2025:i:6:p:8768-8785
    DOI: 10.1002/sd.70130
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.70130
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sd.70130?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Taimur Sharif & Mirza Md Moyen Uddin & Constantinos Alexiou, 2025. "Testing the moderating role of trade openness on the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: a novel approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 345(2), pages 597-635, February.
    2. Alexiou, Constantinos, 2023. "Gauging the impact of the strength of patent systems on renewable energy consumption," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 431-439.
    3. Pesaran, M. Hashem & Smith, Ron, 1995. "Estimating long-run relationships from dynamic heterogeneous panels," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 68(1), pages 79-113, July.
    4. Haider Mahmood & Maham Furqan & Najia Saqib & Anass Hamadelneel Adow & Muzaffar Abbas, 2023. "Innovations and the CO 2 Emissions Nexus in the MENA Region: A Spatial Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-20, July.
    5. Nick Johnstone & Ivan Haščič & David Popp, 2017. "Erratum to: Renewable Energy Policies and Technological Innovation: Evidence Based on Patent Counts," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 68(2), pages 441-444, October.
    6. Li, Bingyun & Duan, Yuhua & Luebke, David & Morreale, Bryan, 2013. "Advances in CO2 capture technology: A patent review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 1439-1447.
    7. Allred, Brent B. & Park, Walter G., 2007. "The influence of patent protection on firm innovation investment in manufacturing industries," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 13(2), pages 91-109, June.
    8. Wang, Zhaohua & Yang, Zhongmin & Zhang, Yixiang & Yin, Jianhua, 2012. "Energy technology patents–CO2 emissions nexus: An empirical analysis from China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 248-260.
    9. Yann Ménière & Antoine Dechezleprêtre & Matthieu Glachant & Ivan Hascic & N. Johnstone, 2011. "Invention and transfer of climate change mitigation technologies: a study drawing on patent data," Post-Print hal-00869795, HAL.
    10. Antoine Dechezleprêtre & Matthieu Glachant & Ivan Haščič & Nick Johnstone & Yann Ménière, 2011. "Invention and Transfer of Climate Change--Mitigation Technologies: A Global Analysis," Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 5(1), pages 109-130, Winter.
    11. Werner Antweiler & Brian R. Copeland & M. Scott Taylor, 2001. "Is Free Trade Good for the Environment?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 91(4), pages 877-908, September.
    12. Peters, Michael & Schneider, Malte & Griesshaber, Tobias & Hoffmann, Volker H., 2012. "The impact of technology-push and demand-pull policies on technical change – Does the locus of policies matter?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(8), pages 1296-1308.
    13. Mohd Shahidan Shaari & Faiz Masnan & Mohd Juraij Abd Rani & Zaharah Zainal Abidin & Abdul Rahim Ridzuan & Norreha Othman, 2023. "The Grim Cost of Economic Growth and Environmental Degradation: A Comprehensive Panel ARDL Study of Public Debt in the ASEAN-5 Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-15, July.
    14. David Popp, 2002. "Induced Innovation and Energy Prices," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 92(1), pages 160-180, March.
    15. Verdolini, Elena & Galeotti, Marzio, 2011. "At home and abroad: An empirical analysis of innovation and diffusion in energy technologies," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 61(2), pages 119-134, March.
    16. Hall, Bronwyn H. & Helmers, Christian, 2013. "Innovation and diffusion of clean/green technology: Can patent commons help?," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 33-51.
    17. Linnenluecke, Martina K. & Han, Jianlei & Pan, Zheyao & Smith, Tom, 2019. "How markets will drive the transition to a low carbon economy," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 42-54.
    18. Felix Carl Schultz & Vincent Czyrnik & Ingo Pies, 2024. "Is there a case for or against patents to incentivize green technologies?: A critical evaluation of innovation incentives for the global north and global south," Sustainability Nexus Forum, Springer, vol. 32(1), pages 1-9, December.
    19. Poumanyvong, Phetkeo & Kaneko, Shinji, 2010. "Does urbanization lead to less energy use and lower CO2 emissions? A cross-country analysis," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(2), pages 434-444, December.
    20. Bibhuti Bhusan Mohapatra & Ankita Kumari & Simantini Mohapatra & Bimal Kishore Sahoo, 2023. "Dynamic Relationship Between Carbon Dioxide Emissions and Gross Domestic Product for Low, Middle- and High-Income Countries," Journal of Quantitative Economics, Springer;The Indian Econometric Society (TIES), vol. 21(4), pages 873-898, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Costantini, Valeria & Crespi, Francesco & Palma, Alessandro, 2017. "Characterizing the policy mix and its impact on eco-innovation: A patent analysis of energy-efficient technologies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(4), pages 799-819.
    2. Herman, Kyle S. & Xiang, Jun, 2019. "Induced innovation in clean energy technologies from foreign environmental policy stringency?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 198-207.
    3. Wurlod, Jules-Daniel & Noailly, Joëlle, 2018. "The impact of green innovation on energy intensity: An empirical analysis for 14 industrial sectors in OECD countries," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 47-61.
    4. Kristoffer Palage & Robert Lundmark & Patrik Söderholm, 2019. "The innovation effects of renewable energy policies and their interaction: the case of solar photovoltaics," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 21(2), pages 217-254, April.
    5. Tomasz Kijek & Arkadiusz Kijek & Piotr Bolibok & Anna Matras-Bolibok, 2021. "The Patterns of Energy Innovation Convergence across European Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-17, May.
    6. Li, Kai & Yan, Yaxue & Zhang, Xiaoling, 2021. "Carbon-abatement policies, investment preferences, and directed technological change: Evidence from China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    7. Antoine Dechezleprêtre & Matthieu Glachant, 2014. "Does Foreign Environmental Policy Influence Domestic Innovation? Evidence from the Wind Industry," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 58(3), pages 391-413, July.
    8. Valeria Costantini & Francesco Crespi & Alessandro Palma, 2015. "Characterizing the policy mix and its impact on eco-innovation in energy-efficient technologies," SEEDS Working Papers 1115, SEEDS, Sustainability Environmental Economics and Dynamics Studies, revised Jun 2015.
    9. Zhu, Zhishuang & Liao, Hua & Liu, Li, 2021. "The role of public energy R&D in energy conservation and transition: Experiences from IEA countries," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    10. Pan, Xiuzhen & Wei, Zixiang & Han, Botang & Shahbaz, Muhammad, 2021. "The heterogeneous impacts of interregional green technology spillover on energy intensity in China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    11. David Popp, 2019. "Environmental policy and innovation: a decade of research," CESifo Working Paper Series 7544, CESifo.
    12. Hu, Hui & Qi, Shaozhou & Chen, Yuanzhi, 2023. "Using green technology for a better tomorrow: How enterprises and government utilize the carbon trading system and incentive policies," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    13. Durán-Romero, Gemma & López, Ana M. & Beliaeva, Tatiana & Ferasso, Marcos & Garonne, Christophe & Jones, Paul, 2020. "Bridging the gap between circular economy and climate change mitigation policies through eco-innovations and Quintuple Helix Model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    14. Jingbo Cui & Zhenxuan Wang & Haishan Yu, 2022. "Can International Climate Cooperation Induce Knowledge Spillover to Developing Countries? Evidence from CDM," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 82(4), pages 923-951, August.
    15. Nunes, Inês Carrilho & Catalão-Lopes, Margarida, 2020. "The impact of oil shocks on innovation for alternative sources of energy: Is there an asymmetric response when oil prices go up or down?," Journal of Commodity Markets, Elsevier, vol. 19(C).
    16. Fabrizio, Kira R. & Poczter, Sharon & Zelner, Bennet A., 2017. "Does innovation policy attract international competition? Evidence from energy storage," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(6), pages 1106-1117.
    17. Massimiliano Mazzanti & Antonio Musolesi, 2011. "Income and time related effects in EKC," Working Papers 201105, University of Ferrara, Department of Economics.
    18. Guillouzouic-Le Corff, Arthur, 2018. "Did oil prices trigger an innovation burst in biofuels?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 547-559.
    19. Huangfu, Jianhua & Wei, Weixian & Yu, Lei & Li, Guoliang, 2025. "The impact of environmental policy stringency and oil prices on innovation: Evidence from the new energy vehicle industry in China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 979-996.
    20. Patricia Laurens & Christian Bas & Antoine Schoen & Stéphane Lhuillery, 2016. "Technological contribution of MNEs to the growth of energy-greentech sector in the early post-Kyoto period," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 18(2), pages 169-191, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:33:y:2025:i:6:p:8768-8785. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1719 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.