IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/sustdv/v33y2025i6p8294-8315.html

Harmonizing Green and Health: A Stakeholder Engagement Framework for Integrated Building Evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Hongyang Li
  • Tingting Shi
  • Shuying Fang
  • Matthew Moorhead
  • Martin Skitmore

Abstract

“Green + healthy” buildings aim to achieve the dual objectives of energy conservation and well‐being promotion, significantly contributing to global sustainable development goals (SDGs). As intelligent technologies and construction projects grow increasingly complex, evaluation systems struggle to address stakeholders' diverse needs adequately. This paper utilizes the Quantitative Method of Determining Stakeholder Influence Priorities (QM‐DSIP), Dotmocracy, and other techniques to quantify stakeholder impact on these projects and balance the hierarchical relationships between green and healthy buildings elements, establishing a comprehensive stakeholder‐centric evaluation system for “green + healthy” buildings. Based on questionnaire survey data from nine construction‐related‐stakeholder groups in China, the findings indicate that developers and the government are the most influential stakeholders, while property management companies are the least. The system encompasses 12 primary and 38 secondary indicators, with “health and comfort” and “liveability” receiving the highest weights. In contrast, “mental” ranks lowest among the primary indicators. Among secondaries, “indoor thermal and humidity environment” and “safety” are prioritized, while “space privacy” ranks lowest. Our research, rooted in China but with global aspirations, aims to provide replicable scientific methods and frameworks for participatory evaluations of “green + healthy” buildings tailored to each country's characteristics. It also provides theoretical and practical guidance for the entire life cycle of buildings, including assisting stakeholders like developers in considering key elements and making the right decisions during the design stage, using VR and other means to evaluate and compare unbuilt building schemes, and conducting post‐evaluations of built environments or retrofitted existing buildings, proposing improvement measures.

Suggested Citation

  • Hongyang Li & Tingting Shi & Shuying Fang & Matthew Moorhead & Martin Skitmore, 2025. "Harmonizing Green and Health: A Stakeholder Engagement Framework for Integrated Building Evaluation," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(6), pages 8294-8315, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:33:y:2025:i:6:p:8294-8315
    DOI: 10.1002/sd.70085
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.70085
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sd.70085?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Danlei Zhang & Yong He, 2022. "The Roles and Synergies of Actors in the Green Building Transition: Lessons from Singapore," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-19, October.
    2. Mohammad Bilal Shaukat & Khawaja Fawad Latif & Aymen Sajjad & Gabriel Eweje, 2022. "Revisiting the relationship between sustainable project management and project success: The moderating role of stakeholder engagement and team building," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(1), pages 58-75, February.
    3. Stefan Olander, 2007. "Stakeholder impact analysis in construction project management," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(3), pages 277-287.
    4. Prescott C. Ensign & Shawn Roy & Tom Brzustowski, 2021. "Decisions by Key Office Building Stakeholders to Build or Retrofit Green in Toronto’s Urban Core," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-31, June.
    5. Aidana Tleuken & Galym Tokazhanov & Mert Guney & Ali Turkyilmaz & Ferhat Karaca, 2021. "Readiness Assessment of Green Building Certification Systems for Residential Buildings during Pandemics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-31, January.
    6. Komal Batool & Ghaffar Ali & Kaleem Ullah Khan & Muhammad Asif Kamran & Ningyu Yan, 2024. "Integrating role of green buildings in achieving carbon neutrality in an era of climate emergency," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(4), pages 4186-4201, August.
    7. Sadaf Dalirazar & Zahra Sabzi, 2022. "Barriers to sustainable development: Critical social factors influencing the sustainable building development based on Swedish experts' perspectives," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(6), pages 1963-1974, December.
    8. Zhang, Yurong & Wang, Jingjing & Hu, Fangfang & Wang, Yuanfeng, 2017. "Comparison of evaluation standards for green building in China, Britain, United States," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 68(P1), pages 262-271.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Ge & Li, Yang & Zuo, Jian & Hu, Wenbo & Nie, Qingwei & Lei, Heqian, 2021. "Who drives green innovations? Characteristics and policy implications for green building collaborative innovation networks in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    2. Mustaffa, Nur Kamaliah & Kudus, Sakhiah Abdul, 2022. "Challenges and way forward towards best practices of energy efficient building in Malaysia," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    3. Ahsan Nawaz & Xing Su & Qaiser Mohi Ud Din & Muhammad Irslan Khalid & Muhammad Bilal & Syyed Adnan Raheel Shah, 2020. "Identification of the H&S (Health and Safety Factors) Involved in Infrastructure Projects in Developing Countries-A Sequential Mixed Method Approach of OLMT-Project," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-18, January.
    4. Ullah, Nazim & Showrav, Ifthakarul & Eram, Mubarrat, 2023. "Effects of Project Failure Towards Stakeholders: A Review of Literature," MPRA Paper 118721, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Isik Akin & Meryem Akin, 2025. "Promoting sustainable practices through green investments in the United Kingdom real estate industry," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(1), pages 1526-1544, February.
    6. repec:plo:pone00:0229095 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Oluyomi A. Osobajo & David Moore, 2017. "Who is Who? Identifying the Different Sub-groups of Secondary Stakeholders within a Community: A Case Study of the Niger Delta Region of Nigeria Communities," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(9), pages 188-209, September.
    8. Mohammed Rady & Ahmed Farouk Kineber & Mohammed Magdy Hamed & Ahmed Osama Daoud, 2023. "Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling of Constraint Factors Affecting Project Performance in the Egyptian Building Industry," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-16, January.
    9. Qing He & Haiyang Zhao & Lin Shen & Liuqun Dong & Ye Cheng & Ke Xu, 2019. "Factors Influencing Residents’ Intention toward Green Retrofitting of Existing Residential Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-23, August.
    10. Eleftheria Touloupaki & Theodoros Theodosiou, 2017. "Performance Simulation Integrated in Parametric 3D Modeling as a Method for Early Stage Design Optimization—A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-18, May.
    11. Jelena Cvijović & Vladimir Obradović & Marija Todorović, 2021. "Stakeholder Management and Project Sustainability—A Throw of the Dice," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-22, August.
    12. Haonan Zhang, 2023. "Leveraging policy instruments and financial incentives to reduce embodied carbon in energy retrofits," Papers 2304.03403, arXiv.org.
    13. Agata Klaus-Rosińska & Joanna Iwko, 2021. "Stakeholder Management—One of the Clues of Sustainable Project Management—As an Underestimated Factor of Project Success in Small Construction Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-27, September.
    14. Lea Fobbe, 2020. "Analysing Organisational Collaboration Practices for Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-21, March.
    15. Coma Bassas, Ester & Patterson, Joanne & Jones, Phillip, 2020. "A review of the evolution of green residential architecture," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    16. Daniela M. Salvioni & Alex Almici, 2020. "Transitioning Toward a Circular Economy: The Impact of Stakeholder Engagement on Sustainability Culture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-30, October.
    17. Xiaolong Gan & Kangkang Yan & Kexin Xie & Yongtao Tan, 2023. "The policy trajectory of green building development in China: A sequential and network analysis," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(4), pages 2979-2996, August.
    18. Ying Xie & Yisheng Liu, 2022. "Tripartite Evolutionary Game Analysis of Stakeholder Decision-Making Behavior in Energy-Efficient Retrofitting of Office Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-22, September.
    19. Ki-Won Lee & Young Il Kim, 2022. "Selection of Energy Improvement Factors and Economic Analysis of Standard MDU Complexes in Korean Metropolitan Regions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-24, May.
    20. Gabriel Andy Szalkowski & Christian Johansen, 2024. "Defining and measuring the effects of digital technologies on social sustainability: A systematic literature review," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(3), pages 1678-1699, June.
    21. Luis Felipe Cândido & Jose Carlos Lazaro & Adriano Olivier de Freitas e Silva & José de Paula Barros Neto, 2023. "Sustainability Transitions in the Construction Sector: A Bibliometric Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-26, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:33:y:2025:i:6:p:8294-8315. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1719 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.