IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/sustdv/v33y2025i6p8008-8024.html

Deconstructing Tensions in the Adoption of Digital Innovation in Sustainable Supply Chain Management: A Qualitative Study

Author

Listed:
  • Surajit Bag

Abstract

While the benefits of digital technology adoption in supply chains are well recognized, the adoption of digital innovation for sustainability, particularly in small and medium‐sized enterprises (SMEs), often faces delays. One underexplored area is the role of persistent tensions that complicate this process. This study addresses this gap by applying paradox theory to uncover and categorize the tensions that emerge during digital innovation adoption within sustainable supply chain management (SSCM). Using a qualitative approach based on 40 semi‐structured interviews with SMEs and the Gioia methodology, the study identifies nine distinct tensions, grouped under four paradox dimensions: learning, organizing, belonging, and performing. This novel application of paradox theory provides a rich lens to understand the contradictory but interrelated forces at play. Theoretically, the study extends the literature on digital innovation and paradox theory by framing tensions as ongoing, interdependent dynamics in SSCM contexts. Practically, it offers managers actionable strategies based on separation and synthesis for steering these tensions and advancing digital innovation in sustainability‐driven supply chains.

Suggested Citation

  • Surajit Bag, 2025. "Deconstructing Tensions in the Adoption of Digital Innovation in Sustainable Supply Chain Management: A Qualitative Study," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(6), pages 8008-8024, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:33:y:2025:i:6:p:8008-8024
    DOI: 10.1002/sd.70086
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.70086
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sd.70086?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:33:y:2025:i:6:p:8008-8024. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1719 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.