IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/sustdv/v33y2025i5p7526-7545.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Revisiting the Circular Economy Paradox: A Triple Bottom Line Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Marta Ferrer‐Serrano
  • Aitor Salesa

Abstract

The Circular Economy (CE) has emerged as a transformative organizational paradigm designed to address the environmental limitations of linear production and consumption systems. Despite its growing prominence, there is ongoing debate about the extent to which CE truly embodies sustainability, particularly whether it adequately addresses the economic, environmental, and social dimensions defined by the Triple Bottom Line (TBL). This study investigates how the TBL approach is addressed in organizational CE research by conducting a bibliometric analysis of 815 academic publications spanning the past two decades. The results reveal a consistent increase in scholarly engagement, marked by a shift from operational‐level concerns toward more systemic approaches focused on resource efficiency and innovative business models. However, the analysis also highlights a notable underrepresentation of the social dimension, raising concerns about the comprehensiveness of current sustainability assessments. Based on these findings, the study identifies key research gaps and proposes eight future research directions to advance a more balanced and integrated understanding of CE as a sustainable model.

Suggested Citation

  • Marta Ferrer‐Serrano & Aitor Salesa, 2025. "Revisiting the Circular Economy Paradox: A Triple Bottom Line Perspective," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(5), pages 7526-7545, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:33:y:2025:i:5:p:7526-7545
    DOI: 10.1002/sd.3539
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.3539
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sd.3539?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:33:y:2025:i:5:p:7526-7545. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1719 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.