IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/sustdv/v33y2025i5p7005-7024.html

Ecological Effects of Forest Tenure Reform in Southern China: An Institutional Change Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Chen Liang
  • Shenwei Wan
  • Yang Zhou
  • Shuifa Ke
  • Yiming He

Abstract

The forest tenure reform plays a crucial role in the sustainable development of forest areas. It secures people's livelihoods and fosters the continuous growth of forest resources, generating substantial ecological effects. However, a systematic evaluation of the ecological effects of forest tenure reform remains absent. Here, we utilize remote sensing data from forest areas in southern China spanning 1998–2022 and employ a staggered Difference‐in‐Differences (DID) alongside an event study model to assess the ecological effects of forest tenure reform. Specifically, we examine the effects of the devolution of forest tenure reform (DFTR) and the improvement of forest tenure reform (IFTR). Our findings reveal that DFTR significantly promoted the short‐term recovery of forest ecosystems. During the IFTR stage, forest ecological benefits have been effectively maintained through policies that harmonize private interests, economic factors, and ecological considerations. Mechanism analysis indicates that changes in the forest tenure system have shifted the focus of forest management from timber production toward multifunctional uses, including ecological conservation, recreational services, and understory cultivation. Heterogeneity analysis further reveals that during the DFTR stage, counties in important river basins and with high levels of agricultural mechanization experienced stronger ecological impacts from the policy. In contrast, these regions exhibited significant negative effects in the IFTR stage. To address these challenges, future policy reforms should prioritize scientific adjustments to the utilization of ecological public welfare forests, expansion of forest ecosystem payment mechanisms, development of innovative forestry technology services, and the promotion of large‐scale forestry management. Our findings provide valuable insights for further advancing forest tenure reform.

Suggested Citation

  • Chen Liang & Shenwei Wan & Yang Zhou & Shuifa Ke & Yiming He, 2025. "Ecological Effects of Forest Tenure Reform in Southern China: An Institutional Change Perspective," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(5), pages 7005-7024, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:33:y:2025:i:5:p:7005-7024
    DOI: 10.1002/sd.3508
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.3508
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sd.3508?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Agrawal, Arun, 2001. "Common Property Institutions and Sustainable Governance of Resources," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 29(10), pages 1649-1672, October.
    2. Li, Yi & Gong, Peichen & Ke, Jiesheng, 2021. "Development opportunities, forest use transition, and farmers' income differentiation: The impacts of Giant panda reserves in China," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    3. Wang, Xiaobing & Yamauchi, Futoshi & Otsuka, Keijiro & Huang, Jikun, 2016. "Wage Growth, Landholding, and Mechanization in Chinese Agriculture," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 30-45.
    4. Zhang, Xiaobo & Yang, Jin & Reardon, Thomas, 2020. "Mechanization outsourcing clusters and division of labor in Chinese agriculture," IFPRI book chapters, in: An evolving paradigm of agricultural mechanization development: How much can Africa learn from Asia?, chapter 2, pages 71-96, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    5. Myers, Rodd & Fisher, Micah & Monterroso, Iliana & Liswanti, Nining & Maryudi, Ahmad & Larson, Anne M. & Mwangi, Esther & Herawati, Tuti, 2022. "Coordinating forest tenure reform: Objectives, resources and relations in Indonesia, Kenya, Nepal, Peru, and Uganda," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    6. Larson, Anne M. & Monterroso, Iliana & Liswanti, Nining & Tamara, Ade, 2023. "What is forest tenure (in)security? Insights from participatory perspective analysis," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    7. Yi, Yuanyuan, 2023. "Devolution of tenure rights in forestland in China: Impact on investment and forest growth," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    8. Yuge Wang & Apurbo Sarkar & Min Li & Zehui Chen & Ahmed Khairul Hasan & Quanxing Meng & Md. Shakhawat Hossain & Md. Ashfikur Rahman, 2022. "Evaluating the Impact of Forest Tenure Reform on Farmers’ Investment in Public Welfare Forest Areas: A Case Study of Gansu Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-17, May.
    9. Andrea Pacheco & Carsten Meyer, 2022. "Land tenure drives Brazil’s deforestation rates across socio-environmental contexts," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-10, December.
    10. Lacour Mody Ayompe & Raymond Ndip Nkongho & Lionel M. Wandum & Bessem O. Orang & Komi K. M. Fiaboe & Emmanuel E. Tambasi & Marianne Kettunen & Benis N. Egoh, 2024. "Complexities of sustainable palm oil production by smallholders in sub‐Saharan Africa," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(1), pages 529-541, February.
    11. Henri‐Noël Bouda & Patrice Savadogo & Daniel Tiveau & Boureima Ouedraogo, 2011. "State, forest and community: challenges of democratically decentralizing forest management in the Centre‐West Region of Burkina Faso," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 19(4), pages 275-288, July.
    12. Xie, Yi & Wen, Yali & Zhang, Yaoqi & Li, Xiaoyong, 2013. "Impact of property rights reform on household forest management investment: An empirical study of southern China," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 73-78.
    13. Hyde, William F., 2016. "Whereabouts devolution and collective forest management?," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 85-91.
    14. Xu, Jintao & Hyde, William F., 2019. "China's second round of forest reforms: Observations for China and implications globally," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 19-29.
    15. Veli Yilanci & Recep Ulucak & Yaoqi Zhang & Valeria Andreoni, 2023. "The role of affluence, urbanization, and human capital for sustainable forest management in China: Robust findings from a new method of Fourier cointegration," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(2), pages 812-824, April.
    16. Ke, Shuifa & Qiao, Dan & Yuan, Wantong & He, Youjun, 2020. "Broadening the scope of forest transition inquiry: What does China's experience suggest?," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    17. Xie, Lunyu & Berck, Peter & Xu, Jintao, 2016. "The effect on forestation of the collective forest tenure reform in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 116-129.
    18. Abdulai, Awudu & Owusu, Victor & Goetz, Renan, 2011. "Land tenure differences and investment in land improvement measures: Theoretical and empirical analyses," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(1), pages 66-78, September.
    19. Li, Lanying & Lu, Gang & Shen, Yueqin, 2021. "The evolution and impact of timber markets in China's southern collective forest region," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    20. Zhang, Daowei, 2019. "China's forest expansion in the last three plus decades: Why and how?," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 75-81.
    21. Dong, Jiayun & Liang, Wenyuan & Fu, Yimin & Liu, Weiping & Managi, Shunsuke, 2021. "Impact of devolved forest tenure reform on formal credit access for households: Evidence from Fujian, China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 486-498.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hu, Chao & Dong, Jiayun, 2025. "Program sustainability and property right factors influencing farmers' self-predicted post-program land investment behavior - Evidence from land enrolled in the Sloping Land Conversion Program in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    2. Yuge Wang & Apurbo Sarkar & Min Li & Zehui Chen & Ahmed Khairul Hasan & Quanxing Meng & Md. Shakhawat Hossain & Md. Ashfikur Rahman, 2022. "Evaluating the Impact of Forest Tenure Reform on Farmers’ Investment in Public Welfare Forest Areas: A Case Study of Gansu Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-17, May.
    3. Xu, Tuoyuan & Zhang, Xiaoxiao & Agrawal, Arun & Liu, Jinlong, 2020. "Decentralizing while centralizing: An explanation of China's collective forestry reform since the 1980s," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    4. Duan, Wei & Shen, Jinyu & Hogarth, Nicholas J. & Chen, Qian, 2021. "Risk preferences significantly affect household investment in timber forestry: Empirical evidence from Fujian, China," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    5. Jian Wei & Hui Xiao & Hao Liu & Xiaotao Huang & Dahong Zhang, 2022. "Does the Collective Forestland Tenure Reform Promote Rural Households’ Forestry Inputs? Based on Dual Perspectives of Rural Households’ Divergence and Inter-Generational Differences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-23, October.
    6. Okumu, Boscow & Muchapondwa, Edwin, 2017. "Determinants of Successful Collective Management of Forest Resources: Evidence from Kenyan Community Forest Associations," EfD Discussion Paper 17-11, Environment for Development, University of Gothenburg.
    7. Yuewen Huo & Songlin Ye & Zhou Wu & Fusuo Zhang & Guohua Mi, 2022. "Barriers to the Development of Agricultural Mechanization in the North and Northeast China Plains: A Farmer Survey," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-14, February.
    8. Aryal, Jeetendra Prakash & Rahut, Dil Bahadur & Thapa, Ganesh & Simtowe, Franklin, 2021. "Mechanisation of small-scale farms in South Asia: Empirical evidence derived from farm households survey," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    9. Ping Xue & Xinru Han & Yongchun Wang & Xiudong Wang, 2022. "Can Agricultural Machinery Harvesting Services Reduce Cropland Abandonment? Evidence from Rural China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-15, June.
    10. Jiquan Peng & Zihao Zhao & Lili Chen, 2022. "The Impact of High-Standard Farmland Construction Policy on Rural Poverty in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-20, September.
    11. Yuepeng Zhou & Xiaoping Shi & Dengyan Ji & Xianlei Ma & Satish Chand, 2019. "Property rights integrity, tenure security and forestland rental market participation: Evidence from Jiangxi Province, China," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 43(2), pages 95-110, May.
    12. Okumu, Boscow & Muchapondwa, Edwin, 2020. "Determinants of successful collective management of forest resources: Evidence from Kenyan Community Forest Associations," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    13. Long, Hexing & de Jong, Wil & Yiwen, Zhang & Liu, Jinlong, 2021. "Institutional choices between private management and user group management during forest devolution: A case study of forest allocation in China," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    14. Trejos, Bernardo & Flores, Juan Carlos, 2021. "Influence of property rights on performance of community-based forest devolution policies in Honduras," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    15. Xi Yu & Xiyang Yin & Yuying Liu & Dongmei Li, 2021. "Do Agricultural Machinery Services Facilitate Land Transfer? Evidence from Rice Farmers in Sichuan Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-14, April.
    16. Qiangqiang Zhang & Beibei Yan & Xuexi Huo, 2018. "What Are the Effects of Participation in Production Outsourcing? Evidence from Chinese Apple Farmers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-15, November.
    17. Jinna Yu & Yiming Wei & Wei Fang & Zhen Liu & Yujie Zhang & Jing Lan, 2021. "New Round of Collective Forest Rights Reform, Forestland Transfer and Household Production Efficiency," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-22, September.
    18. Winarno, Kodrad & Sustiyo, Joko & Aziz, Ammar Abdul & Permani, Risti, 2025. "Unlocking agricultural mechanisation potential in Indonesia: Barriers, drivers, and pathways for sustainable agri-food systems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    19. Meinzen-Dick, Ruth & Lambrecht, Isabel & Place, Frank & Chigbu, Uchendu Eugene & Monterroso, Iliana & Suhardiman, Diana, 2025. "Expanding tenure horizons in food policy research," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    20. Qian, Long & Lu, Hua & Gao, Qiang & Lu, Hualiang, 2022. "Household-owned farm machinery vs. outsourced machinery services: The impact of agricultural mechanization on the land leasing behavior of relatively large-scale farmers in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:33:y:2025:i:5:p:7005-7024. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1719 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.