IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/sustdv/v33y2025i5p6620-6638.html

When Teachers Walk the Green Talk: An Empirical Study on How Pro‐Environmental Behaviors Boost Teachers' Self‐Efficacy in Education for Sustainable Development

Author

Listed:
  • Fenghua Xu
  • Xiaofei Liu
  • Junyuan Chen

Abstract

The worsening ecological crisis and increasingly complex environmental issues have given education for sustainable development a more critical mission and significant challenges. Teachers' self‐efficacy in overcoming these obstacles is vital for quality education for sustainable development implementation. Existing research has explored the impact of various professional development programs on teachers' self‐efficacy for sustainable development education, with the knowledge factor receiving much attention. This study investigated the specific mechanisms by which teachers' pro‐environmental behaviors influence their education for sustainable development self‐efficacy. Structural equation modeling of questionnaire data from 215 elementary school teachers revealed that teachers' pro‐environmental behaviors can directly affect sustainable development scientific task‐solving self‐efficacy and significantly influence education for sustainable development teaching self‐efficacy, mediated by teachers' interest in sustainability issues and sustainable development scientific task‐solving self‐efficacy. These findings indicate a need to emphasize developing teachers' pro‐environmental behaviors and sustainability issue concerns in teacher education programs, as well as improving teachers' environmental science literacy to enhance teachers' education for sustainable development self‐efficacy, thus providing strong motivational support for implementing high‐quality education for sustainable development.

Suggested Citation

  • Fenghua Xu & Xiaofei Liu & Junyuan Chen, 2025. "When Teachers Walk the Green Talk: An Empirical Study on How Pro‐Environmental Behaviors Boost Teachers' Self‐Efficacy in Education for Sustainable Development," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(5), pages 6620-6638, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:33:y:2025:i:5:p:6620-6638
    DOI: 10.1002/sd.3485
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.3485
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sd.3485?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bill Hopwood & Mary Mellor & Geoff O'Brien, 2005. "Sustainable development: mapping different approaches," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 13(1), pages 38-52.
    2. Lin Meng & Wentao Si, 2022. "Pro-Environmental Behavior: Examining the Role of Ecological Value Cognition, Environmental Attitude, and Place Attachment among Rural Farmers in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-24, December.
    3. Khalifatulloh Fiel’ardh & Indra Fardhani & Hiroki Fujii, 2023. "Integrating Perspectives from Education for Sustainable Development to Foster Plant Awareness among Trainee Science Teachers: A Mixed Methods Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-20, April.
    4. Sydney Barnason & Christine Jie Li & Damon M. Hall & Sonja A. Wilhelm Stanis & John H. Schulz, 2022. "Environmental Action Programs Using Positive Youth Development May Increase Civic Engagement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-9, June.
    5. Julius Grund & Antje Brock, 2020. "Education for Sustainable Development in Germany: Not Just Desired but Also Effective for Transformative Action," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-20, April.
    6. Haoyi Huang & Eddie W. L. Cheng, 2022. "Sustainability Education in China: Lessons Learnt from the Teaching of Geography," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-19, January.
    7. Kevin Handtke & Lisa Richter-Beuschel & Susanne Bögeholz, 2022. "Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Teaching ESD: A Theory-Driven Instrument and the Effectiveness of ESD in German Teacher Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-32, May.
    8. Eleni Sinakou & Vincent Donche & Jelle Boeve-de Pauw & Peter Van Petegem, 2019. "Designing Powerful Learning Environments in Education for Sustainable Development: A Conceptual Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-23, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mirjam Braßler & Sandra Sprenger, 2021. "Fostering Sustainability Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behaviours through a Tutor-Supported Interdisciplinary Course in Education for Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-21, March.
    2. Endl, Andreas & Tost, Michael & Hitch, Michael & Moser, Peter & Feiel, Susanne, 2021. "Europe's mining innovation trends and their contribution to the sustainable development goals: Blind spots and strong points," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    3. Chen, Shih-Chih & Hung, Chung-Wen, 2016. "Elucidating the factors influencing the acceptance of green products: An extension of theory of planned behavior," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 155-163.
    4. Bach Quang Ho & Yuki Inoue, 2020. "Driving Network Externalities in Education for Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-16, October.
    5. Mario Pansera & Fabien Martinez, 2017. "Innovation for development and poverty reduction: an integrative literature review," Post-Print hal-02887777, HAL.
    6. Dawid Szostek, 2019. "The Impact of the Quality of Interpersonal Relationships between Employees on Counterproductive Work Behavior: A Study of Employees in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-33, October.
    7. Hametner, Markus, 2022. "Economics without ecology: How the SDGs fail to align socioeconomic development with environmental sustainability," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    8. Alpaslan Kelleci & Oğuz Yıldız, 2021. "A Guiding Framework for Levels of Sustainability in Marketing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-14, February.
    9. Susmita Sarmin & Atia Shahin & Md. Faruq Hasan, 2024. "Influence of socio-demographic and psychological factors on shaping farmers’ pro-environmental behavior in Dinajpur, Bangladesh," Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 8(4), pages 1017-1049, December.
    10. Witold Chmielarz & Marek Zborowski, 2022. "On the Assessment of e-Banking Websites Supporting Sustainable Development Goals," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-20, January.
    11. Xuezhen Xu & Fang Wang & Tao Xu & Sufyan Ullah Khan, 2023. "How Does Capital Endowment Impact Farmers’ Green Production Behavior? Perspectives on Ecological Cognition and Environmental Regulation," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-27, August.
    12. Bahadur Ali Soomro & Ikhtiar Ali Ghumro & Naimatullah Shah, 2020. "Green entrepreneurship inclination among the younger generation: An avenue towards a green economy," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(4), pages 585-594, July.
    13. Homeyra Khatami & Neda Abdolvand & Saeid Homayoun & Saeedeh Rajaei Harandi, 2025. "Sustainable Development and Corporate Profitability: Data Mining Approach," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 27(5), pages 1973-2000, October.
    14. Korina Katsaliaki & Navonil Mustafee, 2015. "Edutainment for Sustainable Development," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 46(6), pages 647-672, December.
    15. Higgins, Colin & Walker, Robyn, 2012. "Ethos, logos, pathos: Strategies of persuasion in social/environmental reports," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 194-208.
    16. Frame, Bob & Brown, Judy, 2008. "Developing post-normal technologies for sustainability," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(2), pages 225-241, April.
    17. Shah, Sayed Kifayat & Zhongjun, Tang & Sattar, Abdul & XinHao, Zhou, 2021. "Consumer's intention to purchase 5G: Do environmental awareness, environmental knowledge and health consciousness attitude matter?," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    18. Gabriel Medina & Cassio Pereira & Joice Ferreira & Erika Berenguer & Jos Barlow, 2022. "Searching for Novel Sustainability Initiatives in Amazonia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-13, August.
    19. Tukker, Arnold & Ekins, Paul, 2019. "Concepts Fostering Resource Efficiency: A Trade-off Between Ambitions and Viability," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 36-45.
    20. Daniela Ferreira da Silva & Anabela Carvalho & Maria Fernandes-Jesus, 2025. "Political Imaginaries in the Climate Movement: Youth-Led Groups Constructing Plural Views of the Future," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 30(2), pages 416-433, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:33:y:2025:i:5:p:6620-6638. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1719 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.