IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/sustdv/v33y2025i5p6378-6398.html

Towards policy Mixes Formulation to Support Green Transitions in Rural Areas: A methodological Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Naomi di Santo
  • Morteza Yazdani
  • Antonio Lopolito
  • Edgardo Sica
  • Roberta Sisto

Abstract

Rural areas are crucial for green transitions, due to their resource‐based economies and extensive scope, covering over 80% of EU territory and housing 30% of the population. Achieving sustainability in rural areas is complex, given the multiple socio‐stechnical factors involved. This highlights the need for a comprehensive ‘policy mix’ that goes beyond myopic decisions focused on isolated issues and instead embraces a long‐term perspective on resource management. The study aims to propose an innovative methodological approach for the design of policy mix to support green transitions in rural areas, using a Local Action Group (LAG) as a case study. The approach integrates participatory techniques involving experts and LAG member farmers, and two multi‐criteria decision‐making methods—namely fuzzy level‐based weight assessment (LBWA) and the new fuzzy combined compromise solution (CoCoSo). Local stakeholders focused on adopting a biomass centre for the reuse of agricultural waste. The LBWA and CoCoSo methods then identified the best policy mix to address barriers and facilitate the innovation's implementation.

Suggested Citation

  • Naomi di Santo & Morteza Yazdani & Antonio Lopolito & Edgardo Sica & Roberta Sisto, 2025. "Towards policy Mixes Formulation to Support Green Transitions in Rural Areas: A methodological Approach," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(5), pages 6378-6398, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:33:y:2025:i:5:p:6378-6398
    DOI: 10.1002/sd.3455
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.3455
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sd.3455?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Guillermo M. Cejudo & Philipp Trein, 2023. "Pathways to policy integration: a subsystem approach," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 56(1), pages 9-27, March.
    2. Florin-Constantin Mihai, 2023. "Circular Economy and Sustainable Rural Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-5, January.
    3. Antonio Lopolito & Edgardo Sica, 2022. "Designing Policy Mixes to Address the World’s Worst Devastation of a Rural Landscape Caused by Xylella Epidemic," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-14, May.
    4. Wilts, Henning & O'Brien, Meghan, 2019. "A Policy Mix for Resource Efficiency in the EU: Key Instruments, Challenges and Research Needs," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 59-69.
    5. United Nations UN, 2015. "Transforming our World: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development," Working Papers id:7559, eSocialSciences.
    6. Cong, Rong-Gang & Thomsen, Marianne, 2021. "Review of ecosystem services in a bio-based circular economy and governance mechanisms," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    7. Michael Howlett & Jeremy Rayner, 2013. "Patching vs Packaging in Policy Formulation: Assessing Policy Portfolio Design," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 1(2), pages 170-182.
    8. Markard, Jochen & Raven, Rob & Truffer, Bernhard, 2012. "Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(6), pages 955-967.
    9. Michael Howlett & Jeremy Rayner, 2013. "Patching vs Packaging in Policy Formulation: Assessing Policy Portfolio Design," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 1(2), pages 170-182.
    10. Rogge, Karoline S. & Reichardt, Kristin, 2016. "Policy mixes for sustainability transitions: An extended concept and framework for analysis," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(8), pages 1620-1635.
    11. Morteza Yazdani & Dragan Pamucar & Prasenjit Chatterjee & Shankar Chakraborty, 2020. "Development of a decision support framework for sustainable freight transport system evaluation using rough numbers," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(14), pages 4325-4351, July.
    12. Francesco Crespi & Claudia Ghisetti & Francesco Quatraro, 2015. "Environmental and innovation policies for the evolution of green technologies: a survey and a test," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 5(2), pages 343-370, December.
    13. Carolina Milhorance & Eric Sabourin & Jean-François Le Coq & Priscylla Mendes, 2020. "Unpacking the policy mix of adaptation to climate change in Brazil’s semiarid region: enabling instruments and coordination mechanisms," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(5), pages 593-608, May.
    14. Pejman Ebrahimi & Seyed Mozaffar Mirbargkar, 2017. "Green entrepreneurship and green innovation for SME development in market turbulence," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 7(2), pages 203-228, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Andrew Ngawenja Mzembe & Frans Melissen & Stiliyana Pinteva, 2026. "Is Governance a Driver of Sustainability Transitions? Evidence From Tourism and Urban Socio‐Technical Systems," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(2), pages 2022-2039, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liam Fullbrook & Joanna Vince, 2026. "Policy fit: lessons from ocean governance in Australia," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 59(1), pages 23-51, March.
    2. Nuñez-Jimenez, Alejandro & Knoeri, Christof & Hoppmann, Joern & Hoffmann, Volker H., 2022. "Beyond innovation and deployment: Modeling the impact of technology-push and demand-pull policies in Germany's solar policy mix," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(10).
    3. Most Asikha Aktar & Mukaramah Binti & Md. Mahmudul Alam, 2020. "Science, Technology and Innovation (STI) Policy for Sustainable Development," Post-Print hal-03519872, HAL.
    4. Edmondson, Duncan L. & Kern, Florian & Rogge, Karoline S., 2019. "The co-evolution of policy mixes and socio-technical systems: Towards a conceptual framework of policy mix feedback in sustainability transitions," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(10).
    5. Scott, William A., 2024. "Cost, innovation, and emissions leakage from overlapping climate policy," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    6. Schmidt, Tobias S. & Sewerin, Sebastian, 2019. "Measuring the temporal dynamics of policy mixes – An empirical analysis of renewable energy policy mixes’ balance and design features in nine countries," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(10).
    7. Lindberg, Marie Byskov & Markard, Jochen & Andersen, Allan Dahl, 2019. "Policies, actors and sustainability transition pathways: A study of the EU’s energy policy mix," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(10).
    8. Kern, Florian & Rogge, Karoline S. & Howlett, Michael, 2019. "Policy mixes for sustainability transitions: New approaches and insights through bridging innovation and policy studies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(10).
    9. Schot, Johan & Steinmueller, W. Edward, 2018. "Three frames for innovation policy: R&D, systems of innovation and transformative change," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(9), pages 1554-1567.
    10. Karoline S. Rogge & Elisabeth Dütschke, 2017. "Exploring Perceptions of the Credibility of Policy Mixes: The Case of German Manufacturers of Renewable Power Generation Technologies," SPRU Working Paper Series 2017-23, SPRU - Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex Business School.
    11. Juntunen, Jouni K. & Shakeel, Shah Rukh, 2026. "Contextualizing policy mixes – A configurational study on rapid transitions," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(1).
    12. Döme, Viktória & Cycak, Weronika & Matus, Kira JM, 2025. "Variations in innovation strategies for sustainable development: Sustainable innovation policy instrument mixes of ten small OECD countries across five sectors," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(6).
    13. Bhardwaj, Chandan & Axsen, Jonn & Kern, Florian & McCollum, David, 2020. "Why have multiple climate policies for light-duty vehicles? Policy mix rationales, interactions and research gaps," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 309-326.
    14. Caloffi, Annalisa & Freo, Marzia & Ghinoi, Stefano & Mariani, Marco & Rossi, Federica, 2022. "Assessing the effects of a deliberate policy mix: The case of technology and innovation advisory services and innovation vouchers," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(6).
    15. Frank, Alejandro Germán & Gerstlberger, Wolfgang & Paslauski, Carolline Amaral & Lerman, Laura Visintainer & Ayala, Néstor Fabián, 2018. "The contribution of innovation policy criteria to the development of local renewable energy systems," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 353-365.
    16. Daniel Béland & Michael Howlett & Philip Rocco & Alex Waddan, 2020. "Designing policy resilience: lessons from the Affordable Care Act," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 53(2), pages 269-289, June.
    17. Sampsa Hyysalo & Jani Lukkarinen & Paula Kivimaa & Raimo Lovio & Armi Temmes & Mikael Hildén & Tatu Marttila & Karoliina Auvinen & Sofi Perikangas & Allu Pyhälammi & Janne Peljo & Kaisa Savolainen & L, 2019. "Developing Policy Pathways: Redesigning Transition Arenas for Mid-range Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-22, January.
    18. Carmen Heinrich & Christoph Knill & Yves Steinebach, 2025. "Analyzing industrial policy portfolios," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 58(1), pages 87-109, March.
    19. Nina Savela & Jarkko Levänen & Sara Lindeman & Nnenesi Kgabi & Heikki Koivisto & Meri Olenius & Samuel John & Damas Mashauri & Minna M. Keinänen-Toivola, 2020. "Rapid Urbanization and Infrastructure Pressure: Comparing the Sustainability Transition Potential of Water and Energy Regimes in Namibia," World, MDPI, vol. 1(2), pages 1-18, July.
    20. Hilde Nykamp, 2020. "Policy Mix for a Transition to Sustainability: Green Buildings in Norway," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-17, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:33:y:2025:i:5:p:6378-6398. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1719 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.