IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/sustdv/v33y2025i4p6260-6275.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Addressing the Diversity Paradox: A Resource‐Based View of DEI Best Practices

Author

Listed:
  • Mark Daniel Wickham
  • Terese Fiedler
  • Timothy Ian Donnelly

Abstract

This paper explores the benefits and challenges of Diversity, Equity and Inclusion practices, with an emphasis on their relevance to the UN's Sustainable Development Goals (#5 ‘gender equality’ and #8 ‘inclusive economic growth’). While effective DEI practices are linked to desirable societal, organisational and individual outcomes (e.g., sustainable social, environmental and economic development), there exists a ‘diversity paradox’, where the implementation of DEI policies yields mixed or contradictory results. Based on the content analysis of official reports and websites published by the top 20 firms in Fair360's 2024 DEI rankings, this study identifies 26 resources and four key capabilities that underpin DEI best practices that potentially avoid the diversity paradox. This paper discusses how these capabilities contribute to achieving SDGs #5 and #8 and concludes with recommendations for future research (including the need for broader data sources, quantitative studies and context‐specific analyses to better understand and enhance DEI practices).

Suggested Citation

  • Mark Daniel Wickham & Terese Fiedler & Timothy Ian Donnelly, 2025. "Addressing the Diversity Paradox: A Resource‐Based View of DEI Best Practices," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(4), pages 6260-6275, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:33:y:2025:i:4:p:6260-6275
    DOI: 10.1002/sd.3467
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.3467
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sd.3467?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:33:y:2025:i:4:p:6260-6275. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1719 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.